جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « سیاست نامه ها » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The present study seeks to explore the concept of statehood in the intellectual tradition of policy-writing of the middle period of Iran; to answer the question of what characteristics the components of the model of policy-writing in terms of statehood, in the written works of this period, in view of the weakening of the Islamic caliphate and the formation of semi-independent monarchies include and how it is related to the thought of the state in Iran. After explaining the four components of "the unity of religion and politics", "Kingdom and monarchy", "just observance and interaction" and "maintaining power and denying opponents", these indicators were examined using the "adaptive method" among the works (Sier ul Mulook, Alnasaeh and Nasaeh ul Mulook). The findings of the study indicate that the Khwaja sought to Farrah-izadi culture and religious legitimacy for the king, Onsorolmaali replaced the earthly kingdom with religious legitimacy, and Ghazali is a middle ground in the form of the theory The shadow of God. All three thinkers have centered their idea around the king, but the creation of a wide court is specific to the Khwaja, and the Onsorolmaali and the Ghazali are placed in the next places respectively. In order to "observe and interact fairly", Onsorolmaali and Ghazali have referred to the control of the subjects and the army through the systems of taking tribute and issuing orders, but Khwaja has paid less attention to the issue of justice than others. Respectively, Khwaja, Onsorolmaali and Ghazali sought "expansion", "acquisition" and "preservation" of power in their works. finally, it can be concluded that the processes governing the formation of the government in Iran show that the government was an establishment and in the continuation of the policy texts, it reflects the experience of the Iranian government to respond to the requirements of new political systems in "practical politics".

Discussions on political thought in Iran, focusing on the Islamic period, refer the researcher directly to a collection of works that have been written under the title of policy in different periods of history. Policy-making in this period is the result of the accumulation of an intellectual-cultural dichotomy that on the one hand is a reflection of political thought in ancient Iran and on the other hand is mixed with elements of Islamic political thought. The most authoritative work in this framework It is Seljuk. Since then, other works that have been written and addressed under this title have followed almost the same trend in terms of method and content. However, it would not be an exaggeration to say that the purpose of writing these works was in principle to maintain power. Maintaining the ruling power can be understood by trying to legitimize it in a knowledge-power interaction. Therefore, according to its subject, an attempt has been made to answer the question of the relations between power and expediency of the political authorities and the ruling socio-political power in

Governance is the process of decision-making and its implementation, and one of the principles of governance in classical texts is advice or policy-making, by which the ways and means of maintaining the authority and legitimacy of political power are explained and presented, in which Much attention has been paid to the management and regulation of affairs and the relationship between citizens and rulers. In fact, political advice deals with how political systems work and the influence of factors in the production and distribution of political power, and what is the best way to maintain power. Therefore, the research seeks to understand the principles of governance in the classical texts of Eastern and Western political thought, especially the "letter" of Tensor Machiavelli's "Shahriar". In Tensor's view, the adjustment of religion and politics in the relationship between society and the ruler, and the extremism and support of authoritarian rule have always been emphasized by Machiavelli, and the results show that Tensor and Machiavelli aim in governance-related policies to provide a behavioral idea. It is appropriate for the government to gain and keep high power alive.

In this essay we put forward the STATECRAFT as a modern issue and at the same time we are trying to recognize its live questions and matters. So in this context for a first time we tried to study TARIKH_E_BEIHAQI as a mirror for princes' book and provided a new narration of this Iranian heritage with pragmatic approach of political agents. All of this for providing a primitive framework for a pattern of governing and statecraft which extracted from TARIKH_E_BEIHAQI with so mentioned political agents approach in three dimensions of believes , morals and actions of them. It is worth noting that these researchers have taken advantage of Grounded Theory as method of research for this study

The history of Iranian political thought during the Islamic era can be divided in 2 parts: middle era and modern era. In the middle era which ended in Mashroota revolution, political thought tended to be united with religion, with the rules of thought –genera being based upon religions tents, and the role of reason being only limited to uncritical exposition of the predecessor’s ideas. As a result the political thought was characterized as authoritative. In the modern era, the restoration of traditional concepts was restarted after an interval, and modern Iranian political thought gave up its authoritative character. This article aims to demonstrate that Iranian political thought during the Islamic era missed its philosophical essence after Farabi.