جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « مردمسالاری دینی » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The model of the political system in any society is always influenced by the beliefs and values of that society. This issue has taken a more prominent form in Iranian society after the Islamic revolution of 1357.with the study of the community of humanities students of the Islamic Azad University of Shiraz University, aims to investigate the influence of religious beliefs and values on the formation and realization of the model of religious democracy. Based on Cochran's formula, 332 people were selected as the sample size by simple random sampling method and were analyzed by t-test method. The findings show that the realization of the model of religious democracy is influenced by the attitude of the people of the Iranian society towards the components of this model. the realization of the model of religious democracy means the acceptance of a distinct form of society administration, which can also be considered as a factor for the expansion of the Islamic Revolution. From this point of view, issuing the model of religious democracy means issuing the values of the Islamic Revolution in the new stage of the Islamic Revolution. Another argument is that the link between religion and political values by the Islamic revolution is a special and distinct model, which is clearly a negation of the propagation of the model of secularism on the one hand and an ineffective negation of the role of religion in the administration of Islamic societies on the other hand.

Religious democracy is a political theory based on the two principles of God and people, but at the same time it is not theocracy or democracy. Rulers in a theocracy are considered to be appointed by God, enforce His law, and answerable only to Him, while in a democracy they rule according to the will of the majority of the people. The main research question is, what is the position of God and people in the religious democratic system based on the principles of the constitution? In response, data and documents are collected and analyzed with a descriptive-analytical approach and library tools. According to the results of this research, based on the principles of the constitution, religious democracy is based on both the foundation of God and the people, the political will of the people is defined during the absolute sovereignty of God, and the laws of God, chosen by the majority of the people, form the framework of the political system, and in that people They are in control of their destiny on behalf of God, and those in charge are accountable both to the people and to God.

The model of democracy was established in Iran as one of the most creative models of political systems after the 1979 revolution. The process of establishment and continuation of this model of governance is different from the model of liberal democracy and in the opposite direction to the universal trend of secularism and the explanation of its various dimensions needs research. In this research, from the thought of Ayatollah Motahhari, who was the chairman of the Revolutionary Council and its ideologue, the indicators of the model of religious democracy and their internal relationship are obtained by analytical-descriptive method and the use of library resources and works. According to the results of this study, belief in the political authority of religion and the position of the people in politics provides the basis for the establishment of a religious democracy system, with the establishment of this system and observance of the law, political equality and freedom; The nation and the government will move towards the implementation of justice and independence, and as a result, more turn to religion and a stronger presence of the people, and this situation will create the cycle of establishing and consolidating the religious democracy system.

Shura is one of the accepted principles among all Islamic religions and each religion has its own interpretation based on its principles. These different interpretations reflect the role of the council in religious democracy. Using a comparative method, this article seeks to find the commonalities and differences between the theory of the council from the perspective of Shiite and Sunni thinkers, relying on the views of Imam Khomeini and Rashid Reza. The answer to this question clarifies the angles of the council in Islam and the basis of religious democracy; Because both thinkers, based on inferences from the book and tradition and based on their principles, emphasize the principle of the council, and have considered it as a political theory in their idea of ​​Islamic government, but differ in details. From the point of view of most Shiite thinkers, especially Imam Khomeini, since the government has a divine aspect, the council has no role in the divine legitimacy of the religious government and only affects the form of government and its administration and in accordance with Islamic law plays an essential role in legislation. he does; But from the Sunni point of view, the council plays a role both in the legitimacy and formation of the government and in its administration and legislation, because the government, in the view of most of them, including Rashid Reza, is merely a social phenomenon and the responsibility of the people.

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of religious beliefs on the formation of values of religious democracy, which has been done as an example among students of Shiraz Azad University. In the study, the target population is the students of Islamic Azad University of Shiraz University, which is 2500 people. According to Cochran's formula, 332 people were selected as the sample size by simple random sampling. Analysis of research data using SPSS statistical software is analyzed at two levels. In the first level, using descriptive statistical methods (frequency, mean and standard deviation) and in the second level, using inferential statistical methods (one-sample t-test), the data obtained from the questionnaire questions were analyzed. And research questions are answered. Research shows that religious beliefs do not conflict with democratic values. At the same time, the traditional view of religion and its imposition on members of society is not very acceptable. Rather, what is important is a particular type of religion that can both promote religious values in society and that can build people's votes and opinions on the basis of democratic form, the existence of democratic institutions, and attention to the views and opinions of the people.

With the outbreak of the Corona pandemic, one of the most controversial issues in the field of politics is the impact of this disease on the democratic characteristics of countries. Because some governments view the crisis as a factor in internal cohesion and the consolidation of power, it is possible that the spread of the corona could lead to populism and authoritarianism in the world. In the shift to authoritarianism, government control over citizens is being intensified through the use of new technologies, accountability, oversight, and power sharing mechanisms are being disrupted, and citizens' fundamental rights such as freedom of expression and transparency of information are being threatened, and media censorship is growing. Conditions that, if possible, will lead to the massification of societies. The present article, in explaining this controversy, with regard to the self-organizing mechanisms of modern political wisdom in the form of liberalism, shows the reluctance to turn to Chinese authoritarianism and to internalize and promote a kind of self-control and the development of modern authoritarianism. In today's modern world, only a religious democracy can maintain and control its discourse without falling into the dualism of authoritarianism / the preservation of individual liberties.

Islamic Revolution in Iran as a result of modeling the evolution of the system that caused significant changes in different areas of the region and the world. Efficient patterning of capacity, operational theory of velayat-e faqih in the constitution and legal structure in stature - Iran is politically accountable political systems of various forms of alternative circuit is considered. Aside from the lack of international domination and resistance against the harmful effects tricky to dispose of Islamophobia and its conversion to Islam, taking Voice of the Islamic Republic of Muslim nations to form a new regional power structure has become the new structure has become a regional power. Iran capable of mobilizing public opinion and political parties in the area for signs of the the impact assessment is this simple, The results will be evident in the future. This article reviews the available data and analytic methods, identify challenges, potential solutions and patterning of the Islamic Revolution in the Muslim countries of the region, the likelihood of diversion, Likely to deviate from the path of the revolution itself has been analyzed.

The New political Systems seek mobilization and Maximizing political participation of their citizens. This process can strengthening the relationship between the political system and the people in order to facilitate the continuation of the political system, through obtaining political legitimacy of government. It is clear that in the Islamic political system the doctrine of “Enjoining Good and Forbidding Evil " Plays a major role in political development, The Holy Quran, and Hadith Texts, and Article VIII of the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, are sources for this doctrine.
Three spheres of People-people (Parallel)) People-rulers (Opposite Ascending) and Rulers – people (Opposite Descending) in these teachings are what distinguishes the religious democracy from liberal democracies. This paper tries to develop this hypothesis that the realm of people – rulers is forgotten in enforcing teachings or Enjoining Good and Forbidding Evil. Therefore, this paper relying on interpretive method and with taking advantage of the use of theory of religious democracy concludes that the revival of the third realm needs to log in the political culture of the Muslim community among people, intellectuals, and Political elites.

Managers as leaders of the society enjoy highest impact on leading the country to the Islamic civilization. The purpose of this paper is to study the lifestyle of the managers and to present a right pattern. In this regard the question is about the favorable indicators of manager’s Lifestyle in religious democracy. What is the desirable lifestyle pattern for a manager in the religious democracy? The research hypothesis is based on the three dimensions of a leader’s lifestyle including: political beliefs, political ethics and political behavior of the components of the relationship with God, self, others. Peopleorientated maners, service, simplicity, justice, responsibility and love can be the main indicators of a manager lifestyle. Research method is Qualitative analysis and interpretation.
The results show that three layers of beliefs, values and behaviors have the power to design a manager’s lifestyle. Each of these dimensions by creating links with God, with self, with others and nature can found the base of the managers lifestyle. With the creation of this communication indicators empty baskets for indicators have been created then the empty baskets have been filled from Nahjolbalaghe and practices of Imam Ali (p).

Undoubtedly the political and social unity in the religious democratic system is one of the necessities of religious lofty life. The present article seeks to respond to the following question: What are the factors and challenges towards the political and social unity in a religious democratic system? Explaining the meaning of unity, the significance of social and political unity, and its typology in the holy Quran, the article deals with the unity inspiring factors and capacities in the society (brotherhood, justice, gaining the endearment of others, and peace). It continues to study the factors giving rise to doctrinal, ethical, and social unity, and also the factors eliminating doctrinal, ethical, and social unity, all supported with certain examples and evidence from the founder of the Islamic Republic and the supreme leader following a descriptive – analytical method.

Theory of religious democracy which is arised from intellectual system of the Islamic Republic's leaders are trying to create an appropriate relationship between democracy and religion. This approach to answer the questions of political system is common to Sunni political thinkers. In recent decades new reading of islam which can be articulated with democracy as well as reading such model of democracy (democracy as method).that can be articulated with islam, is clear in new sunni political discourse. This article seeks to compare the views of religious democracy in the Islamic republic leaders (Imam Khomeini(p.h). and the Supreme Leader). and Yusef al Qarzavy in three dimensions: theoretical foundations, principles and elements to establish religious democracy and the practical principles of religious democracy, and is trying to show common and distinguished points of religious democracy in their thoughts. The hypothesis is that there is some common sphere in theory and system of religious democracy so it is possible to make dialogue between shiaa and sunni approaches of religious democracy. This article shows that in theoretical foundations, common points of two approaches are more than practical mechanism of Islamic democracy.

Reviewing the content of democracy، in context of new western ideology، the present article seeks to show why and how the new democracy concentrates on the priority of democracy over philosophy and virtues of ancient Platonic philosophy. As a matter of fact this paper shows that democracy، namely liberal democracy، in modern age concentrates on efficiency instead of citizenship virtues as it is interpreted in ancient political thought. In contrast، religious democratic methods of governing focus on supreme goods. Surveying the issue of democracy، revisiting the crises arising from democracy in the context of capitalism، and reviewing the discourses of modernity and its crises، this article puts a new question on your desktop whether democracy can guarantee happiness in a westernized society without a religious approach. However the response here is embracing morality which is only possible in religious methods of governing; or religious democracy as it is interoperated here.