جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « رضایت » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

The punishment and its influencing factors are among the important issues that have been mentioned in various methods in religious texts. By examining a set of verses and narratives about the punishment, one can consider satisfaction and action as two influential elements in the punishment calculation of one's practice. This means that in Islamic teachings the punishment of the individual is sometimes evaluated on the basis of satisfaction and sometimes on the basis of performance. Hence, at first glance the reader notices the conflict. Therefore, in the present study, by using a descriptive-analytical method we try to provide some solutions to eliminate primitive conflicts and in this way, we come closer to the philosophy of convicted and satisfied punishment. The findings of the study indicate that by clarifying the concept of satisfaction, paying attention to the application of literary sciences, separating the field of ethics from jurisprudence, and distinguishing the fundamental principles from secondary principles of religion, one can resolve the conflict. Thus, both elements of satisfaction and action were found to be effective and consistent in the calculation of action sentences.

According to Salafists, salaf is divided into two types, temporal and methodical. They consider the first three generations of Muslims i.e. the generations of Prophet Muhammad and his companions (the Sahabah), their successors (the Tabi‘un), and the successors of the successors as both temporal and methodical salaf while those who adhere to their methods and lifestyle are considered to be salafis, though they may not be living in their times. One of the fundamental principles of the salafis is the authority of the predecessors' (Salaf) understanding considering it necessary to follow them both in belief and practice. The verse 100 of Surah al-Tawbah of the Quran is one of the Quranic proofs concerning the authority of the predecessors' understanding. This verse faces problems from within itself as well as from other verses and narrations; therefore, it is not able to substantiate the claims made by Salafists. In this article which has been written with an analytical and descriptive method, the opinion of Salafis concerning the verse 100 of Chapter al-Tawbah has been critically assessed.

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship of trust on customer loyalty in service companies. The aim of this research in terms of causal and functional. The sample included 351 people from future insurance customers protect producers who have been selected for sampling. To collect data from the questionnaire and the analysis of data, structural equation modeling with LISREL software used has been conducted. The results of this analysis show that the propensity to trust and consent of both the goodwill and reputation (of trust), impact. The results show the relationship of benevolence on customer loyalty is more than the credit.

The intention and the consent are two fundamental stages in creating contract and unilateral contract. This paper attempts to answer this question whether temporary separation of intention and consent is possible or there are conditions. Jurisconsults and jurists have offered three theories for answering this question: 1. The religious and intellectual possibility of temporary separation between intent and consent (the separation theory). 2. The religious and intellectual impossibility of temporary separation between intent and consent based on referring intention to religious consent (the referring theory) 3. The intellectual impossibility of separation between intent and consent whether the consent be natural or intellectual (the intellectual Inseparability) This essay criticizes these three theories and eventually offers its noble theory based on the religious impossibility of temporary separation between intent and consent and intellectual possibility of separation between them.