جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « کیهان شناسی کوانتومی » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

The proposed theories about the beginning and end of the world in modern cosmology are one of the most important points of intersection between science and religion. Some common models and theories in quantum cosmology, as a naturalistic and godless explanation of the world, have become a tool to oppose religious beliefs about creation. This is the model presented by Stephen Hawking in collaboration with James Hartl. In this model, Hawking disagreed with the theories that considered the world to be open, eternal, and infinitely extended in the past, and he admits the limitation and finitude of the world. At the same time, he believes that the world was not an accident or a beginning, it is non-eternal and non-accidental, and as a result, it has always been, is, and will be. Therefore, the world does not have a beginning to be in need to a beginner as God, and it does not have an end, nor a resurrection. The following article aims to introduce the mentioned point of view in a descriptive way with regard to the imaginary time that plays an important foundational role in Hawking's cosmology. Then evaluate it in a rational-analytical way and recognize its theological implications. The result of the research is that the above-mentioned model, given its correctness, in addition to scientifically and logically requiring further investigation, does not imply Hawking's ontological naturalism.

A noteworthy problem in modern cosmology, wich is noted by scientists, philosophers and religious scholars is the question of why and how did our universe come to being. Some physicians try to explain it from nothing by chance, withought need of Divine creation. Lawrence M. Krauss has tried to do this on the basis of quantom cosmology and completes the answer by explaining the laws of nature through chance and multiverse theory. Concequently he thinks that Divinly explanation of the world is somehow contradictory with simplicity principle. The present issue is to study the mentioned explanation with biblical-descriptive method and evaluate it by rational analythical one. The result is that it is affected by several scientific and logical deficiencies, as well as being objected by Ockham,s razor.