جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Quranic terminology » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

Takfir is one of the most important challenges of the Islamic world in the present age and one of the causes of division between Muslims. The principles of Takfir root in incorrect interpretations of verses and hadiths and bring forth excuses for deviant and vicious groups. On the other hand, some hadiths from Shiite sources which express points of Takfir (in their first layer of meaning), beside their unstable understanding, has provided a groundwork for dissident medias to provoke enmity among Muslims. This article, which uses descriptive-analytical and library method, tries to present a true, firm and comprehensive analysis around these hadiths based on the terminology of "believer" in the Qur'an and "degrees of infidelity, polytheism and misguidance" in the verses. By adjustment hadiths accordingly to Holy Qur'an, incorrect interpretations have been criticized also their important jurisprudential effects discussed. The findings show that as infidelity, polytheism and misguidance have been used in the Qur'an in various levels, so the practical and pivotal point to analyze hadith and solving apparent conflicts is the same. Also, "believer" in its Qur'anic term includes all Muslims - except in special cases - and the judicial verdicts such as purity and forbiddance of Gheebah (backbiting) for all Muslims sects.

  Ishtiqaq, derivation, is a terminological field and a way for exact perception of the meanings of words and forming various types of words. Ishtiqaqi kabir is a kind of ishtiqaq found in the words of three identical main letters but in various orders. As the Quran`s terminology, of which ishtiqaqi kabir is a topic, is a necessary ground for perceiving the verses, the paper has intended to survey the existence or non-existence of ishtiqaqi kabir and, given the former, to find their semantical relation and its domain in the Quran Exegesis. As described in the paper, 348 cases of ishtiqaqi kabir are found in the Quran of which 234 cases are of two derivations, 82 of three, 23 cases of four, 7 cases of five and two cases of six ones. In more cases the existence of semantical relation of the words are clear; in some cases, however, there may not be found any semantical relation. Finding semantical relation is helpful for finding semantical substance of the word in the verse and, in the case of disagreement, it may be a clue to the correct view.

Quranic terminology is of the knowledge thatto deal with it in a scientific correct waycan be very useful in the Qur’an science and its interpretation.For this purpose, wehave selected the word “byword”that is very used in The Holy Quran and in the infallibletradition, peace be upon them.The reasonfor thischoice is the divine mandatetothe peoplein different words and phrases.The certitude and thecontemplationthat arehiddenin theQuranicversesare only revealedand fall in theheart of wise men by learning from them.The present article is a result of the researchon this term andinaddition tothe extraction ofits meaningfrom the Quranicand the Arabicdictionariesitssemantic domain amongits similar wordsand itsapplicationin thestyleof verseshas been studied.

One of the Quranic expressions giving rise to numerous syntactic and exegetical discussions for long is that of "waykaannallaha" and "waykaannahu" in Sura al-kaṣaṣ، Verse 82. The present article surveys the views of grammarians and exegetes concerning this expression. The study opens with quotations of experts in syntax and exegesis of first Islamic centuries along with their analysis، and closes with a view supported by certain evidence along with the requirements of Quranic eloquence in this regard. Concerning the structure of this expression، majority of researchers in syntax have adopted Sybawaih's view considering it a compound formed of "way" and "kaanna" as the best view. There is no difference today among experts in syntax on the fact that "way" has a distinct meaning and position from "kaanna" in the compound "waykaanna". It is also clear that "way" is an exclamation pronounced outomatically when facing and unexpected affair. However، there is disagreement on whether by "Kaanna" is meant likeness and simile or emphasis، or even something else. The outcome of our discussion is that this compound indicates a composition of surmise and surprise along with a sense of coming upon unawares and being awakened after being under illusions. This view is supported by the syntactic and linguistic analysis of the compound as it is strengthened by the context of the story of the perishing of ḳārūn.