جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « absolute existence » در نشریات گروه « فلسفه و کلام »

< p >AbstractIn Ayatollah Javadi Amoli''s view, the "principle of reality" is the first self-evident proposition. Given the position of the first self-evident theorem in the construction of epistemology, it is important to recognize its epistemological instances. This article, based on a library-based method of information gathering with rational analysis, has identified the "principle of reality" in Ayatollah Javadi Amoli''s thought. The next step explains why it is self-evident first, then reveals the origin of the perception of the "principle of reality" and examines its relation to the "principle of contradiction" in order to further understand the epistemological value of this principle. This research has shown that the manifestation of the "principle of reality" does not mean the manifestation of reality or the absolute existence of the outside, so that in addition to the epistemological findings, the ontological field has also provided effective results.

Verbal conflict resolution between the two sects of Moushabahe and Mounazahe is one of the MullaSadra's achievements of knowing God as Absolute existence .Conflict between Moushabahe and Mounazahe is in discussion of God's attributes. Of the two sects, one believes that God is like human beings have and organs (Moushabahe) while other rejects assigning such attributes to God. MullaSadra solved the conflict between the two views by "soul" and "absolute existence" knowledge of God. According to MullaSadra, God is absolute existence simplicity, as in all stages and levels of existence. But, this doed not damage its mere existence. He knows soul as God that while it is at the same company of the material, it doed not have propertiesof the material. In this paper, after explaining the views of Moshabahe and Mounazahe, MullaSadra"s view as a way out of the conflict between the views of these two sects has been paid

In the two articles entitled “Non-Judgeablity of Existence” (2010) and “The Obstacles to the Judgeablity of the essence of Existence” (2014), the author was seeking to prove that the essence of existence is non-judgeable. In other words, it is impossible to impose prescriptions and descriptions on the truth of existence.
In the first article, the proofs are as follows: (a) neither presence nor absence of description; (b) neither the pure existence of description, nor the contradiction to it; (c) neither the absolute existence of description, nor being an instance of it; (d) the difference between the definitions of descriptions and the definition of absolute existence. Similarly, in the second article, the four obstacles have been referred to: (a) non-plurality of existence; (b) impossibility of accidents on the truth of existence; (c) impossibility of essentially obligatory accidents and essentially impossible accidents on the existence; and (d) limitlessness of truth of existence on the non-Judgeablity of existence.
The present article is seeking to review the proofs of non-Judgeablity of existence as well as the obstacles of its Judgeablity. It seems that the spirit of both articles and the related arguments as well as obstacles are the same, and that discovering the main sophistries can falsify the validity of both articles. The present article is seeking to show the weak points of the arguments and obstacles in both articles in brief.

The Existence Unity Is One Of The Most Important And Complex Philosophical And Theosophical Issues Which Has Been Alwas Discussed And Consideered By Many Scholars. The Theosophists Such As Ibn_E Arabi¡Ghounavi ¡Abdol Razzagh Kashani Have acceptedin and climed its intuition and scholars like Mollasadra has proved it by rational backpround and Alle_O Dolleh Semnani has denied and challengend it. This stadyaims to investigate the view of Molla Mohammed Mehdi Naraghi on existence unity issue and his caritical presentations of unity existence ¡ especially Mollasadra,s view and other theosophists . To do so , firstly his glancing view on this issue is discussed and finally his criticisms on the views related to existence unity are specified .