جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « ادبیات اقلیت » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

Jill Deleuze is one of the greatest contemporary philosophers, including thinkers in the field of minority literature studies has had significant. "Minority" is the breaking of the shackles that bind us to certain ways of thinking in order to eliminate and achieve conventional realms through demilitarization. Becoming or becoming means the transitions through which a concept is transformed.The minority becomes a resistance to the ideology of the majority and represents an escape from the norms of the majority. All forms are to go to the literature of the minority and to become a minority. Becoming plays a central role in Deleuze's view. He uses the rhizome to explain his philosophy of becoming. In this research, in a descriptive-analytical method, while providing a definition of minority literature, an attempt is made to analyze and recognize this theory in the novel Verman Jai Khali Salouch. Thrill comes from its influence.By reading two novels, according to the approach of minority literature, we found that the features of this thinking are among the most important It is characterized by deterritorialization to achieve becoming, and the application of this approach is possible in both novels.

 Minority literature in the contemporary world has attracted much attention. Jill Deleuze, the theorist of this idea in the last century, has attracted many characters in sciences such as philosophy, literature, psychology and linguistics with his minority literature. After an in-depth study of Marx and Freud"s views along with Nietzsche"s views, he turned to writing works and proposing theories that influenced the views of critics and writers on literature and sociology. The design of minority literature by him and his friend Guitar created a revolution in the views and attitudes of the people of art and literature. Deleuze is one of the greatest contemporary philosophers and one of the thinkers who has studied significant minority literature. "Minority" is, in fact, the overcoming of the constraints that have gripped literature and invites us to think in new and different ways in order to eliminate and transform conventional realms through demilitarization. The meaning of becoming or becoming is the passages in which a concept, even a language, is transformed. "Becoming" plays a central role in Deleuze"s view. The purpose of this research is to investigate and recognize this theory in the novel "Vacancy of Salouch".

 This research has been done by descriptive-analytical method. The study area and society is Mahmoud Dolatabadi"s novel The Void of Salouch.

 Characters, actions and reactions and their reactions, especially in "Morgan", which has a polar character in the novel, were examined from the beginning to the end of the story with tools such as desire, becoming, negation and reactivation, and it became clear how both he and the story Leads to minority literature. All these actions are described in this article.

 Salouch"s vacancy is one of the stories that can be studied in minority literature and this work can be introduced to the audience in the position of a great work with minority components.

This article investigates different types of violence in relation to otherness and perception of hidden audience aboutThis article investigates different types of violence in relation to otherness and perception of hidden audience about violence in the novel of Laughter-seller Gypsy. Gypsies are almost absent in Iranian literature; being othered and marginalized signifies the hidden violence obliterating their footprint from literature. Laughter-seller Gypsy is one of the rarest novels representing the strange world of gypsies. It narrates their wanderings, and the violence they bear from insiders and outsiders. Violence can be found in two dimensions in this novel: violence as imposed by non-gypsies on the travelers, and the other type installed by gypsies upon themselves, which reflects the external pressures. The author takes advantage of “counter-storytelling” and uses gypsy narrators to make the violent atmosphere tangible. Also, by breaking the clichés up, it challenges the black and white image of gypsy characters. The dominance of the hierarchical system, racial and ethnic discrimination, insults and curses, accusations, division of gypsy and non-gypsy society, ban of marriage between travelers and villagers, murder, plunder and torture are some types of violence in the Akbarkermaninejad’s novel. This novel reflects the personal and social violence, seeking its causes through a deep investigation, and develops empathy of audience. Violence is a habitus for gypsies and they not only don’t stop it, but also do it themselves. Facing the “cultural other” adjusts the violence of the later generations of gypsies, however, the new generation with medial identity always remains in lower position. Although it has come to the center, it has been pushed to border right in the center.

In some instances of comparative literature research, it is not precisely possible to accredit a literary work to a specific nation or ethnic group. The reason, it seems, lies in the lack of a precise definitions of national literature which in turn is due to the imprecision of the standards set for national literature. Whereas one camp, mainly the disciples of the French school of comparative literature, view language the sole, or at least the strongest criterion for setting the domain of international and national literature, the other camp, mainly the proponents of the American school of comparative literature, casting doubts upon the validity and the efficacy of the linguistic criterion, go for a political identity criterion. Of course, along these two criteria, sometimes other criteria such as historical continuity, shared cultural identity, religious and theological borders, political ideologies and even geographical (co-territorial) borders are also posed. To investigate this problem more profoundly, the present authors, criticizing the above-mentioned standards and criteria and displaying their inadequacy and imprecision, have made an attempt to propose cultural components and the cultural discourse dominating the work as a promising standard.