به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Legislation » در نشریات گروه « پزشکی »

  • Francis Acheampong Osei*, Esther Asantewaa Effah
    Background

    Many countries undertake development activities that utilize resources from the environment. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the Congolese Environmental Agency is supervised by the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development to undertake an environmental assessment of all projects that pose risks to the environment. The present study conducted a critical review of the country’s existing environmental assessment legislation, identifying strengths and weaknesses in the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) system.

    Methods

    A literature survey was done in the Google Scholar, Taylor & Francis, and Elsevier databases, which were also guided by the PRISMA. All full-text articles included in the study were written or translated (using online translation software) into the English language, and also, reported on environmental impact assessment as well as legislation. A textual examination of the included literature was done. A set of adapted analytical criteria was used to critically review the ESIA system in the DRC. The results were discussed, and recommendations were given.

    Results

    It was found that the decree was not effective and efficient for the ESIA study. Some of the key limitations of the ESIA decree included the lack of scoping in the entire ESIA process, alternatives that were limited in scope, fees and charges that were not explicitly stated in the legislation, and the lack of public participation at some stages.

    Conclusion

    The ESIA system in the DRC is ineffective and needs revision to improve its effectiveness.

    Keywords: Environmental impact, Social impact, Legislation, Environment, Democratic Republic of the Congo}
  • معصومه غلامی، امیرحسین تکیان*، محمدجواد کبیر، علیرضا اولیایی منش، مهرداد محمدی
    زمینه و هدف

    علی رغم وجود قوانین و آیین نامه های پرشمار در ارتباط با دسترسی به اطلاعات و شفافیت، در اجرای آنها مشکلات زیادی وجود دارد. هدف این مطالعه، بررسی و تحلیل چالش های فراروی قوانین و اسناد مربوط به شفافیت در حیطه نظام سلامت کشورمان می باشد.

    روش

    اسناد، قوانین و مقررات مرتبط با موضوعات دسترسی به اطلاعات و شفافیت، افشاگری و محرمانگی اطلاعات از حوزه های مختلف گردآوری شد و با استفاده از رویکرد READ مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. پس از نامگذاری نظام مند اسناد و قوانین، اطلاعات آنها در جدولی وارد شد و سپس بخش های مختلف هر سند به دقت مورد تحلیل و مقایسه باهم قرار گرفت.

    یافته ها

    اسناد، قوانین و شیوه نامه های پرشماری برای موضوع دسترسی به اطلاعات و شفافیت وجود دارد، ولی فقدان ضمانت اجرایی هستند که باعث ناکارآمدی این قوانین شده است. برخی از این قوانین و مقررات در تعارض با یکدیگر هستند و نیز کاستی هایی دارند. غالبا بین تدوین لایحه، تصویب قانون و ابلاغ دستورالعمل های اجرایی فاصله زمانی زیاد وجود دارد. گاهی نیز ناآگاهی از شیوه نامه تشخیص و تفکیک اطلاعات مربوط به حریم خصوصی و اطلاعات شخصی، مشکلاتی را به وجود می آورد.

    نتیجه گیری

    توجه به ضمانت اجرایی قوانین، ضرورتی بنیادین است تا بتوان از وضع قوانین کم اثر جلوگیری نمود. تدوین قوانین و آیین نامه ها از لحاظ شکلی و محتوایی باید به گونه ای باشد که امکان سوء برداشت و نقض آنها به حداقل برسد. تصویب لوایح و آیین نامه های اجرایی باید در زمان مقرر انجام شوند تا قوانین در زمان مناسب اجرایی شده و اثربخشی لازم را داشته باشند.

    کلید واژگان: اسناد, دستیابی به اطلاعات, سلامت, شفافیت, قوانین}
    Masoomeh Gholami, Amirhossein Takian*, MohammadJavad Kabir, Alireza Olyaeemanesh, Mehrdad Mohammadi
    Background

    Despite numerous laws and regulations related to access to information and transparency, there are many problems in their implementation. The purpose of this study was to investigate and analyze the challenges facing laws and documents related to transparency in the health system of Iran.

    Methods

    Documents, laws and regulations related to issues of access to information, transparency, and disclosure of information from various fields were collected and analyzed using the READ approach. After systematic naming of documents and laws, their information was entered in a table, after which different parts of each document were carefully analyzed and compared.

    Results

    There are numerous documents, laws and regulations on the issue of access to information and transparency, but the lack of enforcement for these laws and regulations has caused inefficiency. Some of these documents, laws and guidelines are in conflict with each other and some have shortcomings. Often, there is a long time gap between the drafting of the bill, the approval of the law and enforcement of executive instructions. Sometimes, unawarness of the method of identifying and separating privacy information and personal information causes problems in implementation.

    Conclusion

    Attention to enforcement while developing transparency and access to information is a fundamental necessity, in order to prevent introduction of a multitude of ineffective laws. Drafting of laws and regulations in terms of form and content should be in such a way that the possibility of misunderstanding and violation of them is minimized. Approval of bills and executive regulations must be achieved at the appointed time, so that the laws are implemented at the right time and have the required effectiveness

    Keywords: Access to information, Documents, Health, Legislation, Transparency}
  • Maryam Mazaheri, Majid Rezai-Rad, Ferdos Pelarak
    Background

    Road traffic injuries (RTIs) have been eighth leading cause of death in the world and second leading one Iran in 2018. Every year, a large number of motorcycle RTIs lead to deaths and disabilities due to non-compliance with traffic rules and the traditional design of the streets and routes in Dezful, Iran. This study aims to pursue two goals: identifying the legal and environmental factors affecting motorcycle RTIs, and prioritizing effective strategies in reducing number of motorcycle RTIs in Dezful, Iran.

    Methods

    A mixed method approach was used in this study. In the qualitative phase, focus group meetings using key informants were used to identify the effective factors and in the quantitative one a matrix was used for prioritizing effective strategies in preventing motorcycle RTIs.

    Results

    45 basic codes related to legal factors and 8 basic codes of environmental factors were derived from the focus group meetings. Six main legal factors and 3 main environmental factors were prioritized as the most effective strategies to reduce motorcycle RTIs. The legal factors with the highest score were: making visible: obstacles, motorcycles and pedestrians and motorcyclists using colors and stickers or glossy stickers, further monitoring and training of riders’ license issuance schools, seriousness in enforcing the laws and dealing legally and seriously with violators, continuous marking of roads and streets, random check of motorcycleriders' license, and construction of public parking lots in crowded zones. The environmental ones were: identifying places where traffic signs are covered with trees, and reporting through the 137 call center, identifying and reporting shoulderless and hazardous roads by municipality, and Identifying and reporting accident-causing potholes through the 137 call center.

    Conclusion

    All organizations and stakeholders involved in reducing motorcycle RTIs, should take benefit from different recommendation -i.e. education & awareness, law enforcement and legal actions, environmental actions, collaborations, partnerships, and lobbying, and research.

    Keywords: Traffic accidents, Motorcycles, Road traffic -injuries (RTIs), Environmental-factors, Legislation}
  • یوسف رهنما مقدم، محمدرضا پروین*، غلامرضا صالحی جوزانی، علی زارع
    زمینه و هدف

    از منظر دکترین حقوقی دو راهبرد اصلی تنظیم گری در زمینه ایمنی زیستی وجود دارد که عبارتند از: 1 راهبرد دستور و نظارت یا سلسله مراتبی (از بالا به پایین)؛ 2 راهبرد حکمرانی جدید یا مقررات غیر دولتی (از پایین به بالا). راهبرد اخیر، شامل راهبرد های فرعی فراتنظیم گری، مقررات گذاری پاسخگو، خود تنظیم گری و تنظیم گری هوشمند نیز می باشد. با توجه به ارتباط عمیق ایمنی زیستی با مسایل محیط زیست، برخی اصول کلی حقوق محیط زیست نیز لازم الرعایه در قانونگذاری در عرصه ایمنی زیستی می باشند. از این رو با هدف تبیین و تحلیل تطبیقی این موضوعات در بسترهای قانونی متفاوت، در این پژوهش تلاش شده، ضمن بررسی ماهیت و بایسته های مفهومی هر یک از راهبرد ها و اصول حقوقی یادشده، چگونگی اعمال آن ها در قالب قوانین ایمنی زیستی ایران و اتحادیه اروپا نیز مورد ارزیابی و تحلیل قرار گیرد.

    روش

    این مقاله به صورت تحلیلی تطبیقی می باشد و با روش کتابخانه ای، با بهره گیری از ابزار فیش برداری تهیه و تدوین گردیده است.

    ملاحظات اخلاقی: 

    در تمامی مراحل نگارش مقاله حاضر، اصول اخلاقی پژوهش، به ویژه اصالت متن، صداقت، رازداری و امانتداری رعایت شده است.

    یافته ها

    راهبرد تنظیم گری اتحادیه اروپا در زمینه ایمنی زیستی، بر مبنای اصل احتیاط استوار بوده و از منظر فرایند نیز سختگیرانه و دارای رویکرد چندسطحی است. در چنین وضعیتی، قاعده مندی محصولات تراریخته، با فرصت های زیادی جهت آموزش، اطلاع رسانی عمومی و مداخله سطوح متفاوت ذی نفعان (دولت، جامعه مدنی و نهاد های مستقل علمی) در امر تنظیم گری ایمنی زیستی همراه بوده است.

    نتیجه گیری

    اگرچه قانون ایمنی زیستی ایران در سال 1388 با الگوبرداری از قوانین روز تدوین و تصویب شده، اما در مقایسه با قوانین ایمنی زیستی اروپا با رویکرد دستور و نظارت دولتی، اطلاع رسانی ضعیف و عدم مشارکت مردم در تصمیم گیری مواجه بوده و در برخی موارد نیز منجر به عدم انطباق مناسب با قواعد پروتکل ایمنی زیستی کارتاهنا شده است.

    کلید واژگان: راهبرد, قانونگذاری, اصول حقوق محیط زیست, ایمنی زیستی, دستور و نظارت, حکمرانی جدید, رویکرد چندسطحی}
    Yousef Rahnama Moghaddam, MohammadReza Parvin*, GholamReza Salehi Jouzani, Ali Zare
    Background and Aim

    According to the legal doctrines, there are two main regulatory strategies in the field of biosafety: 1. Command and control approach or hierarchical strategy (Top-Down strategy); 2. New governance strategy or non-governmental regulations (Bottom-Up strategy). The last strategy includes also sub-strategies such as Meta-regulation, Responsive regulation, Self-regulation and Smart regulation. Due to a close relationship between biosafety and environmental issues, some general principles of environmental law are required in order to be considered in regulatory processes in the field of biosafety. For this reason, the aim of this research is to explain and analyze these issues under different legal frameworks. In this research, while examining the nature and conceptual requirements of each of the aforementioned strategies and legal principles, their integrations in the biosafety laws of Iran and the Union Europe are comparatively examined and analyzed.

    Method

    The research method is Analytical-Comparative. It has been prepared and compiled by library method using Note-taking techniques.

    Ethical Considerations: 

    In all stages of writing this paper, the ethical principles of research, especially, the originality of the text, honesty and confidentiality have been fully observed.

    Results

    The EU regulatory strategy in the field of biosafety is strictly based on the precausionary principle with a multi-level approach in the decision-making process. In such a situation, the regularity of transgenic products has been associated with many opportunities for education, public awareness and intervention of different levels of stackholders (government, civil society and independent scientific institutions) in regulation making process of biosafety.

    Conclusion

    Although Iran's biosafety law was drafted and approved with consideration of the new and modern laws in 2018, but compared to the EU biosafety laws, it is faced with the government command and control approach (Top-Down approach), poor public awareness, lack of public participation in decision-making, and in some cases it has also led to non- compliance with the Cartagena Protocol.

     

    Keywords: Strategy, Legislation, Principles of Environmental Law, Biosafety, Command, Control, New Governance, Multi, Stage Approach}
  • علی اخوان بهبهانی، ایروان مسعودی اصل*، سمیه حسام، محسن نجفی خواه
    اهداف

     هدف این مطالعه شناسایی چالش های مشارکت مردم در قانون گذاری در بخش سلامت در ایران است.

    روش بررسی

    مطالعه حاضر از نظر هدف، اکتشافی و از نظر فرایند اجرا، کیفی بود. روش گردآوری داده ها با روش مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند و هدف دار با شرکت کنندگان، انتخابی بود.جامعه پژوهش مشتمل بر افراد آگاه و کلیدی (شامل استادان دانشگاه، نمایندگان مجلس، وزرای سابق بهداشت،کارشناسان معاونت قوانین مجلس، کارشناسان حوزه سلامت و حقوقی مرکز پژوهش های مجلس، صاحب نظران و مدیران شاغل در حوزه قانون گذاری سلامت با حداقل ده سال سابقه کار بود.این افراد در زمینه قانون گذاری تجربه داشته و همچنین در خصوص نظام سلامت کشور نیز آگاهی کافی داشتند. تمامی مصاحبه ها ضبط و سپس به صورت متن بازنویسی شد. تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از روش تماتیک انجام گرفت.

    یافته ها:

     بر اساس بیست مصاحبه انجام شده در این مطالعه پنج درون مایه اصلی و 26 درون مایه فرعی (طبقه) ایجاد شد. گروه اصلی مشتمل بر عوامل قانونی، عوامل زیرساختی، عوامل فرهنگی و اجتماعی، عوامل مربوط به مشارکت کنندگان (مردم) و عوامل مربوط به مشارکت پذیران (قانون گذاران) بود. در عوامل قانونی سه زیرطبقه ساختار پارلمان، الزامات قوانین برای نظرخواهی و تسهیلات قوانین؛ در عوامل زیرساختی هفت زیرطبقه شبکه ارتباطات وجود وسایل ارتباط جمعی، اطلاع رسانی، امکان دسته بندی نظرات، امکان مشارکت الکترونیک، امکانات مالی، امکانات ساختاری و امکان دسترسی / ملاقات با قانون گذاران؛ در عوامل فرهنگی و اجتماعی سه زیرطبقه مشارکت جویی مردم، اعتقاد به کار گروهی و سرمایه اجتماعی؛ در عوامل مربوط به مشارکت کنندگان دسترسی به اطلاعات، دسترسی به قانون گذاران،دریافت پاسخ یا بازخورد از قانون گذاران، احساس امنیت پس از ارایه مشورت، میزان آگاهی مردم از حقوق خود، آموزش، امکان تبادل نظر و وجود تیم کارشناسی قوی و در عوامل مربوط به مشارکت پذیران نه زیرطبقه میل به استفاده از نظرات دیگران، ظرفیت پذیرش نظرات متفاوت، عوامل حزبی، عوامل و مصالح منطقه ای، سلامت اداری،آموزش، فرصت کافی، اولویت ها و عوامل انگیزشی ایجاد شد.

    نتیجه گیری:

     چالش های متعددی در مشارکت شهروندان در فرایندهای قانون گذاری در بخش سلامت وجود دارد. در حوزه قوانین لازم است حق مشارکت شهروندان در سیستم حقوقی مشخص شود. برای رفع چالش های فرهنگی و اجتماعی باید شفافیت و تبلیغات حداکثری برای مشارکت مردم صورت پذیرد. در این بین نمایندگان نیز نیاز به آموزش دارند تا بتوانند از ظرفیت مشارکت جامعه استفاده کنند. از طرفی مشارکت کنندگان نیز علاوه بر تسلط بر دانش در حوزه سلامت باید بتوانند به زبان سیاست گذاران نیز سخن بگویند.

    کلید واژگان: نظام سلامت, مشارکت, قانون گذاری, ایران}
    Ali Akhavan Behbahani, Irvan Masoudi Asl*, Somayeh Hesam, Mohsen Najafikhah
    Objective

     This study aims to identify the challenges for public participation in health legislation in Iran.

    Materials & Methods

    This is an exploratory and qualitative study. The study data were collected by using semi-structured interviews. The participants were experts in the field of health law with at least ten years of work experience. They had both experience and enough knowledge about the country’s health system. All interviews were transcribed verbatim after recording and then analyzed using thematic analysis.

    Results

     We identified five main categories (themes) and 26 subcategories related to challenges. The main themes included legal barriers, infrastructure barriers, sociocultural barriers, people’s barriers, and legislators’ barriers. The legal barriers had three subcategories of parliament’s structure, legal requirements for participation, and facilitating laws. The infrastructure barriers had seven subcategories of the existence of mass media and communication networks, informing, ability to access to/meet the legislators, ability to categorize opinions, the possibility of electronic participation, financial resources, and structural facilities. The sociocultural barriers had three subcategories of people’s desire to participate, belief in teamwork, and social capital. Barriers related to people included eight subcategories of access to information, access to legislators, getting answers or feedback from legislators, feeling safe after participation, people’s awareness of their rights, education, ability to exchange views, and the existence of a highly-skilled expert team. Barriers related to legislators had nine subcategories of the desire to use others’ opinions, capacity to accept different opinions, party-related factors, regional factors, administrative health, education, opportunity, priorities, and motivational factors.

    Conclusion

     Iranian citizens have several challenges to participate in health legislation. Regarding legal challenges, it is necessary to determine the participation right of citizens in the legal system. Besides, members of parliament should be educated to use the capacity of public participation. On the other hand, people should speak freely with the legislators and gain health knowledge as well.

    Keywords: Health system, Legislation, Participation, Iran}
  • Zahid Hussain Khan *, Mohammad Dehghan-Tezerjani, Milad Minagar

    Although brain death has been extensively dealt within the contemporary literature, there does exist some ambiguities regarding its definition, clinical criteria, ethical and religious perspectives. The neurological criteria helped in subduing the much talked about issues of whole brain death and brainstem death to a greater extent, but the recently introduced cardiac or circulation death made the issue of brain death more complicated and indeed a conundrum. We would touch upon brain death issues since the terminology was initially introduced till the present day when the cardiac death connivingly made its way as a means of organ procurement in the so called dead patients. This review article is the authors' own perception and understanding of the conundrum of brain death, and should not be misinterpreted as a narrative or a systematic review of the subject. In conclusion, this review aims at filling the void that exists about the criteria for brain death in the contemporary literature.

    Keywords: Brain Death, Legislation, Jurisprudence, Patient Selection}
  • Ali Akhavan Behbahani, Irvan Masoudiasl *, Somayeh Hessam, Mohesn Najafikhah
    Background

    Health legislation provides a framework to implement various health policies. Participatory democracy in healthcare is inevitable. Citizens and health professionals should participate in participatory democracy, and health laws should be the result of a process in which participatory instruments and techniques have a prominent role. Health democracy can be achieved through the expansion of mechanisms for citizens’ participation in the legislative process. The health democracy enables citizens to participate in the decision-making process and to have equal access to services provided by the public health system.

    Objectives

    The current study aims to assess participatory mechanisms used by selected countries to participate their citizens in legislative processes.

    Methods

    The current study is a comparative study of the legislative processes of selected countries. To select countries, four issues were evaluated: (a) overall legal system; (b) how laws enforce; (c) legislative backgrounds; and (d) health system basic model.

    Results

    The number of legislative chambers, legislative initiatives, legislative authorities and institutions, legislative commissions, and citizens’ participation in the legislative process were analyzed in the selected countries. An analysis of the factors affecting public participation in healthcare legislation shows that participation in the legislative process is a complex phenomenon influenced by social, legal, cultural, political, and sovereignty factors. This phenomenon cannot be analyzed isolated from these factors. However, the way should be paved for citizens' participation. The selected countries use different methods for citizens’ participation, depending on their legal systems.

    Conclusions

    Research results show that there are various public participation mechanisms. In Iran, there is a huge potential for public participation, and members of the parliament can easily interact with the interest groups and relevant individuals. These conditions provide a golden opportunity for expert health legislation.

    Keywords: Participation, Health System, Comparative Study, Legislation}
  • Marianna Fotaki *
    While various forms of corruption are common in many health systems around the world, defining wrongdoing in terms of legality and the use of public office for private gain obstructs our understanding of its nature and intractability. To address this, I suggest, we must not only break the silence about the extent of wrongdoing in the health sector, but also talk differently about corruption in general, and corruption in healthcare specifically. I propose adopting the notion of institutional corruption (IC) developed by Thompson and Lessig, as divergence from the original purpose of the institution, which may not be illegal but may nevertheless cause harm to people who depend on it by creating perverse dependencies and compelling individuals to act against its core purpose. Such work is much needed to provide in-depth accounts of how external political and legislative pressures enable corruption in healthcare systems. I also argue for bringing together insights from various research domains and levels of analysis to capture why and how corruption becomes systemic, deeply embedded, and intractable.
    Keywords: Institutional Corruption, Policy, Legislation, Healthcare, Wrongdoing, Illegal}
  • Rahim Khodayari Zarnaq, Neda Kabiri, Gisoo Alizadeh*
    Background

    Development plans aimed at macro-management planning in a country significantly impact all functional fields. This study investigated the status and significance of the health sector in the first to sixth economic, social, and cultural development plans in Iran. 

    Methods

    This was a review study using documentary analysis method. The review was conducted with an emphasis on purposefully selected upstream information. Then, the obtained data were analyzed by the second-hand documents, including authentic reports and published studies on this topic. The data collection instrument was a researcher-made checklist. Data analysis was run using content analysis.

    Results

    There has been increasing attention to the health sector issues throughout development plans. Civil engineering, pharmaceuticals supply, and population control in the first and second plans; the extension of public insurance and service ranking in the third plan; formation of the Supreme Council of Health, and attention to medical emergencies in the fourth plan; targeting subsidies in the fifth plan; and policies to encourage population increase and reduce out-of-pocket expense have been the most critical concerns in the sixth development plan. 

    Conclusion

    Failure to achieve the expected results in the plans and repeating the same text in the following plan indicates the government’s poor commitment to some plan aspects provision, especially at a particular time. Moreover, they paid insufficient attention to international trends and health promotion issues. These issues must be an urgent concern in future development plans.

    Keywords: Social planning, Healthcare sector, Policymaking, Legislation, Iran}
  • علی اخوان بهبهانی، ایروان مسعودی اصل*، سمیه حسام، محسن نجفی خواه
    مقدمه

    مجالس قانون گذاری، مظهر نظام های سیاسی مردم سالار هستند. هر مجلس قانون گذاری، سازمانی پیچیده معمولا با چندصد عضو است و 2 ابزار اصلی سازمان دهی مجالس قانون گذاری، احزاب سیاسی و کمیسیون های داخلی آن هستند. ازسوی دیگر مشارکت و دخالت دولت ها در امر سلامت غالبا از طریق قانون گذاری انجام می شود. قانون گذاری در محیط پیچیده، بسیار تخصصی، حساس و پرچالشی چون سلامت، مستلزم دقت و توجه بسیار زیادی است و از این رو نقش کمیسیون ها در سازماندهی مصوبات حوزه سلامت بسیار مهم و تعیین کننده است.

    روش بررسی

    این پژوهش از نوع تطبیقی بوده و محیط پژوهش، شامل مجالس قانون گذاری در 10 کشور منتخب بوده که با 4 معیار نظام حقوقی، رژیم اجرایی، کارآمدی و موفقیت در امر قانون گذاری و نوع نظام سلامت از طریق جستجوی هدفمند، انتخاب و بررسی شدند.

    یافته ها

    مجالس کشورهای مورد مطالعه برای قانون گذاری در بخش سلامت از مدل های مختلف با سطوح اختیارات متفاوتی استفاده می کنند. در هر 10 کشور مورد مطالعه، کمیسیون های قانون گذاری فعال به اشکال مختلف وجود داشت. در 6 کشور (ژاپن، ترکیه، آفریقای جنوبی، ایالات متحده آمریکا، مصر و ایران)، کمیسیون مستقلی برای امور سلامت وجود دارد و در 4 کشور دیگر، چنین کمیسیونی دیده نشده است. میزان وظایف واختیارات کمیسیون ها در کشورهای مورد مطالعه متفاوت بود.

    نتیجه گیری

    در نظام قانون گذاری ایران، کمیسیون مجزایی برای بهداشت و درمان درنظر گرفته شده است که حوزه اختیارات وسیعی دارد و می تواند به راحتی با ذی نفعان و ذی ربطان در تعامل باشد. این شرایط، موقعیت بسیار مناسبی را برای انجام کار کارشناسی و تخصصی را در حوزه سلامت فراهم می سازد که باید مورد توجه قرار گیرد.

    کلید واژگان: مطالعه تطبیقی, قانونگذاری, نظام سلامت}
    Ali Akhavan Behbahani, Irvan Masoudi Asl*, Somayeh Hessam, Mohsen Najafikhah
    Introduction

    Parliaments are the embodiment of democratic political systems. Each legislative assembly is a complex organization usually with several hundred members. The two main tools for organizing legislative assemblies are political parties and internal parliamentary committees. On the other hand, governments' involvement and interference in health is often achieved through legislation. Legislation in a complex, highly specialized, sensitive and challenging environment such as health requires a great deal of care and attention. Therefore, the role of committees in organizing health approvals is crucial.

    Methods

    This research is a comparative study. The research environment consists of legislative assemblies in ten selected countries that were selected and evaluated by 4 criteria of legal system, executive regime, efficiency and success in legislation and type of health system through targeted search. The level of duties and responsibilities of the commissions varied across the countries studied.

    Results

    The legislatures of the studied countries use different models with different levels of authority to legislate in the health sector. There were various active legislative commissions in all 10 countries studied. In 6 countries )Japan, Turkey, South Africa, USA, Egypt and Iran) there was an Commission on Health Affairs and in 4 other countries such commission were not seen.

    Conclusion

    In the Iranian Parliament, the Independent Commission on Health Care is considered to have a wide range of functions and responsibilities and can easily interact with stakeholder's.Provides expert and specialized work in the field of health that should be considered.

    Keywords: Comparative Study, Legislation, Health Sys tem}
  • Deepthi Athuluru, Chandrasekhara Reddy, KM Sudhir, Krishna Kumar, Sreenivasulu Gomasani, Sreenivas Nagarakanti
    INTRODUCTION

    Indian national law namely Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) exists since 2003 and aims at protecting all the people in our country, but smoking is still prevalent among people. This study was aimed to assess awareness, attitudes, and practices regarding prohibition of sale of tobacco products near educational institutions of Nellore city, India.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in degree colleges of Nellore city of Andhra Pradesh. The study population includes institutional personnel (student, teaching staff, nonteaching staff, and workers) of selected degree colleges of Nellore city. A structured questionnaire was designed for this study which was validated by Davis criteria; reliability was assessed by test–retest design. The questionnaire was divided into five parts consisting of demographic details (age and gender), smoking behavior, knowledge about tobacco control laws, attitudes toward the law and policies, and practices followed in the institution. Logistic regression analysis was used to find out the association between different independent variables to tobacco usage among institutional personnel.

    RESULTS

    Among the study population (n = 400 [100%]), 75.8% of the teaching staff do not know that there should be a board in the institution saying that “sale of tobacco product in an area within the radius of 100 m of educational institution is strictly prohibited,” 82.2% of the study population were not aware to whom should they report, 96.3% of the study population accepted that strict execution of COTPA law saves life, the participants who answered no to strict implementation of COTPA law, and to punish the person who is violating the COTPA law are susceptible to 0.28, and 0.14 times greater odds to be a smokeless tobacco user, respectively.

    CONCLUSION

    The study concluded that there was lack of knowledge about smoke-free legislation among the study population and a high support for strict implementation of COTPA.

    Keywords: Cigarette products, legislation, public opinion, smokers}
  • محمدباقر صابری زفرقندی*، جعفر بوالهری، سید حسین سلیمی، علی فتحی آشتیانی، سیاوش لاجوردی، عمران محمدرزاقی، نددا واحدد، احمدد علی نوربدالا، محمدحسین نیک نام
    هدف
    اعتیاد همواره یکی از چالش های اصلی کشور بوده است. با توجه به پیچیده تر شدن ابعاد اعتیاد، بررسی همه جانبه، شناخت و حل چالش های پیش روی آن ضروری است. رصد وضعیت سلامت روان و اعتیاد یکی از وظایف گروه سلامت روان فرهنگستان علوم پزشکی ایران است. این گروه متشکل از تنی چند از اساتید برجسته دانشگاهی و اجرایی در حوزه سلامت روان، جامعه شناسی و اعتیاد است که در چارچوب رسالت کلی فرهنگستان می کوشد با بهره گیری از ظرفیت های علمی، فرهنگی، اسلامی و فعالیت های جمعی زمینه ارتقای سلامت روان جامعه را فراهم نماید. هدف اصلی گروه بررسی و تحلیل وضعیت موجود و ارائه پیشنهادهای عملی جهت بهبود وضعیت اعتیاد در کشور بوده است تا با انعکاس به مراجع ذی ربط، شاهد اصلاح امور باشیم.
    روش
    در این نشست، اعضا شرکت کننده برای سخنرانی علمی، نقد و ارائه یافته های مربوطه به تبادل اطلاعات در قالب اهمیت موضوع اعتیاد، شیوع، درمان، ساختار و قانون مبارزه با مواد مخدر درکشور و اقدامات اجرایی آن پرداختند. در این زمینه 8 نشست (جلسات 27 الی 34) در سال های 1396-1395به تحلیل مفهوم شناسی، وضعیت اعتیاد و چالش های پیش روی آن در حوزه سیاست گذاری، قانون و حیطه اجرایی در ایران در مقایسه با دنیا اختصاص یافت.
    یافته ها
    یافته های نشست، در قالب جمع بندی مباحث مطرح شده در سلسله نشست ها تنظیم شده است. تحلیل و بررسی موانع و چالش های پیش روی اعتیاد جهت اطلاع به مراجع ذی ربط حاصل اجماع گروه بوده است.
    نتیجه
    با توجه به اهمیت پدیده اعتیاد و نظر به بررسی چالش های آن، نتایج حاصل از این نشست تخصصی که در زمینه بررسی این مهم و در قالب ارائه پیشنهادات جهت اطلاع به سیاست گذاران و مجریان می باشد، مفید و کاربردی خواهد بود.
    کلید واژگان: اعتیاد, سیاست گذاری, قانون گذاری}
    Mohammadbagher Saberi
    Background
    Addiction has always been one of the main challenges of the country. Due to The complexity of addiction dimensions, Comprehensive review, Understanding and solving the challenges ahead is essential. Observation of the mental health status and addiction is one of the duties of the mental health group of the Iranian Academy of Medical Sciences. The group consists of leading academic professors and executive experts in the field of mental health, sociology and science of addiction. The group tries to provide a forum for the promotion of mental health in the framework of the general mission of the Academy.
    To do this, simultaneously with the consensus of experts, it uses the scientific, cultural, and Islamic capacities of the country. The main purpose of the meetings was to analyze the current status of addiction in the country, in order to provide practical suggestions for improving the situation.
    We hope that with the implementation of these suggestions, we will see improvements.
    Method
    During the meeting, the participants participated in scientific lecture, critiques and presenting the data on the importance of the addiction topic; the prevalence, treatment, structure, and law of countering narcotics in country and its Executive actions. In this context, eight sessions(sessions27to34) in years95-96focused on the concept, the state of addiction and its challenges ahead in Iran compared with the world.
    Results
    The findings of this meeting, in the form of the conclusion of considered issues picked up from mentioned specialized meeting are set out. Studying the facing addiction challenges of the considered issues to inform the relevant authorities has been the result of the group's consensus.
    Conclusion
    Considering the importance of the concept of addiction and considering its challenges ahead, the results of this specialized meeting on studying this issue and providing suggestions to inform to answerable organizations, policy makers or administrators, will be practical.
    Keywords: addiction, Policy making, Legislation}
  • سید نادر عقیلیان*، محسن رهامی، هوشنگ شامبیاتی
    زمینه و هدف
    ایجاد نظم بستگی به تمهیدات متعدد در حوزه های مختلف زندگی دارد و محقق شدن نظم در هر قلمروی می بایست با سیاست گذاری مناسب، تدوین اصول راهبردی در سطح خرد و قانون گذاری صحیح در سطح ارگان های حکومتی همراه باشد. یکی از حوزه هایی که به این هدف کمک می کند ارگونومی قانونی است که امروزه با توجه به ایجاد مسائل و مشکلات قانونی درزمینه حوادث و سوانح کاربرد بیشتری یافته است؛ بنابراین در این پژوهش به بررسی مروری ارگونومی قانونی و اثر ایدئولوژی بر آن پرداخته شده است.
    روش کار
    این مطالعه، یک مطالعه مروری می باشد. مقالات منتشر شده انگلیسی در پایگاه های علمی Scopus, PubMed, Google scholar با کلیدواژه"forensic ergonomics" و"forensic human factors" بدون محدودیت زمانی جستجو شد و تعداد 3 مقاله واجد شرایط موردبررسی قرار گرفت.
    یافته ها
    در قسمت مروری نتایج نشان داد که در تعریف ارگونومی قانونی توافق نظر وجود دارد ولی مطالعات صورت گرفته بسیار اندک است. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که کاربرد ارگونومی قانونی رو به افزایش است و دورنمای این حوزه از ارگونومی مثبت است. در قسمت تحلیلی نیز نتایج نشان می دهد که بررسی و پیشنهادات مربوط به ایجاد قوانین درزمینه حوادث و سوانح باید به سیستم قضایی واگذار شود نه سیستم اجرایی یا مقننه.
    نتیجه گیری
    جهت پیشرفت در حوزه ارگونومی قانونی و جلوگیری از تاثیر ایدئولوژی و سیاست زدگی بر قانون گذاری در این زمینه، نیاز به معرفی بیشتر و تربیت متخصصان در این حوزه و توجه به اصول عقلانی و علمی در قانون گذاری احساس می شود.
    کلید واژگان: ارگونومی, قانون گذاری, ارگونومی قانونی, ایدیولوژی}
    Nader Aghilian Seyed*, Mohsen Rahami, Houshang Shambayati
    Introduction
    Establish depends on different arrangements in many aspects of life, including social, cultural, political, economic and justice and the fulfillment of the order, in each of the areas above, should be along with good policy and develop strategic principles, at the micro level and with the correct, firm and prudence legislation in the institutions and governance. Forensic ergonomics that is one of that fields tha helps to this aim, which today has become more widely used due to the creation of legal problems in the field of accidents and injuries. Therefore, this study reviews the forensic ergonomics and the effect of ideology on it.
    Methods
     This is a review study. The articles were in English language that were cited in Pubmed, Scopus, and Google scholar database with key words such as "forensic ergonomic" and "forensic human factor" without time limit were selected, at least 3 articles were eligible.
    Results
    In the review section, the results showed that there is agreement in the definition of forensic ergonomics, but there are very few studies. The results also showed that the use of forensic ergonomics is increasing, and the prospect of this area is positive. In the analytical section, the results also indicate that the review and suggestions for the creation of laws in the field of accidents should be assigned to the judicial system, not the executive or legislative system.
    Conclusion
    In order to progress in the field of legal ergonomics and to prevent the impact of ideology and politics on legislation, there is a need for further introduction and traineeship of experts in this field and paying attention to the rational and scientific principles.
    Keywords: Ergonomics, Legislation, Forensic ergonomics, Ideology}
  • محمدرضا بهارستان فر، سیدمحمد هاشمی*، علی اکبر گرجی ازندریانی، محمدرضا ویژه
    زمینه و هدف

    اهمیت نظام دو مجلسی در راستای حفظ حقوق فردی و اجتماعی شهروندان ازجمله دغدغه های نظام در حوزه حقوق عمومی می باشد از آغاز جنبش نهضت قانون اساسی یکی از مسایل مورد اختلاف و بحث برانگیزی که بین صاحب نظران حقوق و واضعان قانون اساسی وجود داشته و هنوز وجود دارد. ترکیب پارلمان و وجود نظام های ‏یک مجلسی و دو مجلسی است. هدف ما در این تحقیق تبیین لزوم اهمیت و ضرورت نظام دو مجلسی در جهت حفظ حقوق شهروندی می باشد.

    یافته های تحقیق:

    درخصوص نظام تک مجلسی و نظام دومجلسی، استدلال‏های ‏حقوقی و در مواردی باطنا سیاسی درخصوص برتری هر کدام ارایه شده است. بسیاری از نظام های ‏قانون گذاری پیشنهاد دو مجلسی بودن پارلمان را پذیرفته و آن را در قوانین اساسی آوردند. و می طلبد که در ایران نیز این مهم صورت بپذیرد، زیرا مجلس اول نمودار تحرک و نوگرایی است و انعکاس دهنده اراده عام جامعه بوده و از معایب آن در مواردی تصویب قوانین خام به علت شتابزدگی در تصویب برخورد احساسی با بعضی موضوعات می باشد مجلس دوم مظهر تعقل در برابر شتابزدگی، نخبگان در برابر عوام و رای پیران در برابر جوانان می باشد.

    روش تحقیق:

    این مقاله به صورت توصیفی تحلیلی، و به روش استناد از منابع کتابخانه ای تهیه و تدوین گردیده است.

    نتیجه گیری:

    با مطالعات صورت پذیرفته نهایتا به این نتیجه رسیدیم که نظام تقنینی جمهوری اسلامی ایران یک مجلس دو رکنی و نیاز به مجلس دوم بر اساس ضرورت‏ها ‏و کارکردهای این نهاد دارد علی رغم بی توجهی نسبت به این مساله در صورت اصلاحات قانون اساسی این موضوع باید لحاظ گردد. و مجلس دوم بیش از پیش می تواند با اتکا به اصل تعقل در راستای حفظ حقوق فردی و اجتماعی شهروندان گام بردارد. این مقاله به صورت توصیفی - تحلیلی، و با استفاده از منابع کتابخانه ای تهیه و تدوین گردیده است. و از ابتدا تا انتهای این مقاله، اصل امانت داری و بدون جانبداری و با تکیه بر اصول اخلاق و صداقت تهیه و تدوین گردیده است.

    کلید واژگان: مجلس دوم, پارلمان, قانون گذاری, حقوق فردی و اجتماعی, حقوق شهروندی, شورای نگهبان, مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نظام}
    Mohammad Reza Baharestan Far, Seyyed Mohammad Hashemi*, Ali Akbar Gorji Azandaryani, Mohammad Reza Vizheh

    Objective and Background:

     Having a Bicameral System in Line With the Preservation of the Citizens’ Individual and Social Rights is Amongst the System’s Concerns in the Area of Public Rights. Since the Beginning of the Constitutional Movement, one of the Controversial Issues Being Still Debated by the Law Experts and Constitution Enactors is the Combination of the Parliament and the Existence of Unicameral and Bicameral Systems. The Goal of This Research Paper is the Elaboration of the Necessity and Importance of the Bi-Congressional System in Line With the Preservation of Citizenship Rights.

    Study Findings:

    As for the Unicameral and Bicameral Systems, Legal and, in Some Cases, Internally Political Reasoning Has Been Offered Regarding the Superiority of Each. Many of the Legislative Systems Have Accepted the Proposition for the Parliament’s Being Bicameral and Inserted it in Their Constitutions. This Important Task Should be Also Conducted in Iran, As Well, Because the First Congress Manifests Mobility and Innovation and Reflects the Will of the Public; Amongst Its Disadvantages is the Enactment of Raw Regulations in Some of the Cases Due to the Hastiness in Enacting Rules and Emotionally Facing Some of the Subjects. The Second Congress Embodies the Intellectuality, As Opposed to Hastiness, of the Elites in the Face of the General Public as Well as the Opinion of the Elders Versus the Opinion of the Youngsters.

    Study Method:

    This Article has Been Prepared and Codified in an Analytical-Descriptive Form Based on Library Resources.

    Conclusion

     It is Eventually Concluded Based on the Investigations That the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Constitution is in Need of a Bi-Pillar Congress and a Second Congress Based on the Necessities and Functions of This Institution. Despite the Negligence of This Issue, it Has to be Taken Into Account in Case of the Constitutional Reforms. And, the Second Congress Can More Than Before Take Steps Towards the Preservation of the Citizens’ Individual and Social Rights by Relying on the Principle of Intellectuality. This Article Has Been Prepared and Codified in a Descriptive-Analytical Form Through the Use of Library Resources. Trustworthiness is the Principle that has Been Observed From the Beginning to the End of This Article; No Biased ideas Have Been Presented Herein and Ethical Principles and Honesty Have Been Also Observed.

    Keywords: Second Congress, Parliament, Legislation, Individual, Social Rights, Citizenship Rights, Council of Guardians, Expediency Discernment Council}
  • Faisal Jehan, Viraj Pandit, Terence Okeeffe, Asad Azim, Arpana Jain, Saad A. Tai, Andrew Tang, Muhammad Khan, Narong Kulvatunyou, Lynn Gries, Bellal Joseph*
    Background
    Increasing firearm violence has resulted in a strong drive for stricter firearm legislations. Aim of this study was to determine the relationship between firearm legislations and firearm-related injuries across states in the United States.
    Methods
    We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with trauma related hospitalization using the 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Patients with firearm-related injury were identified using E-codes. States were dichotomized into strict firearm laws [SFL] or non-strict firearm laws [Non-SFL] states based on Brady Center score. Outcome measures were the rate of firearm injury and firearm mortality. Linear Regression and correlation analysis were used to assess outcomes among states.
    Results
    1,277,250 patients with trauma related hospitalization across 44 states were included of which, 2,583 patients had firearm-related injuries. Ten states were categorized as SFL and 34 states as Non-SFL. Mean rate of firearm related injury per 1000 trauma patients was lower in SFL states (1.3±0.5 vs. 2.1±1.4; p=0.006) and negatively correlated with Brady score (R2 linear=-0.07; p=0.04). SFL states had a 28% lower incidence of firearm related injuries compared to Non-SFL states (Beta coefficient, -0.28; 95% CI, -1.7- -0.06; p=0.04). Firearm related mortalities resulted in overall 9,722 potential life years lost and more so in the non-SFL states (p=0.001).
    Conclusions
    States without SFL have higher firearm related injury rates, higher firearm related mortality rate, and significant potential years of life lost compared to SFL states. Further analysis of differences in the legislation between SFL and non-SFL states may help reduce firearm related injury rate.
    Keywords: Firearm injuries, legislation}
  • Vera Lucia Raposo*
    Off label prescription is common in Europe and economically motivated off label prescription is being increasingly recognised by the national laws of the Member States of the European Union, even though both European law and the European courts refute the prevalence of financial considerations over public health. This article examines the causes of economically motivated off label prescription, the current legislative and administrative measures implemented in several European countries and its consequences, and it concludes that in very specific scenarios off label prescription grounded in economic reasons should be allowed. Keywords: drugs, off label prescription, public health, austerity, European law Keywords drugs, off-label prescription, public health, austerity, European law
    Keywords: Legislation, jurisprudence, Legislation, Drug}
  • Maliheh Kadivar, Arpi Manookian, Fariba Asghari, Nikoo Niknafs, Arash Okazi, Asal Zarvani
    Since patient safety is multidimensional and grounded in ethical and legal imperatives, both ethical and legal challenges should be taken into account. In this regard, a falling incident case of a 12-day-old newborn was raised in the monthly ethics round in the Children's Medical Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, and the ethical and legal dimensions of patient safety were discussed by experts in various fields.This report presents different aspects of patient safety in terms of root cause analysis (RCA) and risk management, the role of human resources, the role of professionalism, the necessity of informing the parents (disclosure of medical errors), and forensic medicine with focus on ethical aspects
    Keywords: Patient safety, Risk management, Ethics, Legislation, Case study}
  • Jalil Arab, Kheradmand, Shokoufeh Ahmadi *, Akram Baniasadi, Hamidreza Khankeh
    Various disasters are still inevitable and over the last two decades, affected lives of at least 800 million people. Iran is one of the most disaster-prone countries and about 90% of the country are at risks of earthquakes or floods. Thus, the disaster management in our country is a priority. In recent years, several protocols have been put forward to manage the emergencies and disasters. In this regard, the related laws and regulations crisis management are an integrated part of any crisis management which specifies each organization role. One of the important pitfalls in managing risk reduction approach, is the lack of proper laws and regulations and their implementation. Moreover, national guidelines and protocols provides the pathways for different areas of intervention. To solve this shortcoming, a historical review of legislation in this area is helpful. This study aims to review the legislative history of disaster management in Iran, the responsible organizations, and their strong and weak points. This study might help reduce vulnerabilities and boost coordination in crisis management.
    Keywords: Disaster management, Legislation, Iran}
  • Policies on Protecting Vulnerable People During Disasters in Iran: A Document Analysis
    Zahra Abbasi Dolatabadi, Hesam Seyedin, Aidin Aryankhesal
    Context

    Developing official protection policies for disasters is a main strategy in protecting vulnerable people. The aim of this study was to analyze official documents concerning policies on protecting vulnerable people during disasters. Evidence Acquisition: This study was conducted by the qualitative document analysis method. Documents were gathered by searching websites and referring to the organizations involved in disaster management. The documents were assessed by a researcher-made data collection form. A directed content analysis approach was used to analyze the retrieved documents regarding the protection policies and legislation for vulnerable people.

    Results

    A total of 22 documents were included in the final analysis. Most of the documents referred to women, children, elderly people, poor, and villagers as vulnerable people. Moreover, the documents did not provide information regarding official measures for protecting vulnerable people during different phases of disaster management.

    Conclusions

    A clear and comprehensive definition of "vulnerable people" and formulation of official policies to protect them is needs to be formulated. Given the high prevalence of disasters in Iran, policymakers need to develop effective context-based policies to protect vulnerable people during disasters.

    Keywords: Disasters, Emergency, Disaster Management, Vulnerable People, legislation, Policy}
  • Zohreh Behjati Ardakani, Mohammad Taghi Karoubi, Ali Reza Milanifar, Roudabeh Masrouri, Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
    Recent developments and newly-discovered methods for infertility treatment including in vitro fertilization and third party reproduction raise many questions and challenges with different ethical, legal, sociological and psychological dimensions. In Islamic countries, despite great developments in using this technology, the questions concerned with recognition of IVF methods and third party reproduction and legalization of this method are still the challenging ones. The approach of a few Shiite clerics to this issue has facilitated the legalisation of infertility treatment in Iran. The Iranian Parliament, with reference to Shiite clerics’ opinions (Fatwa), enacted the Act concerning Embryo Donation to Infertile Couples and its bylaw which can be considered as a successful example of legalization of third party reproduction in an Islamic country. The aforementioned Act permits embryo donation through artificial insemination from legally married couples to infertile couples. However, many of the legal aspects of this event are not specified in this Act and in many cases it added several uncertainties. This uncertainty, especially regarding the rights and duties of recipients and the child, causes important problems which generate more concerns. This article aimed to review the advantages and flaws of the Act. It is believed that the enactment of the aforementioned Act is an important step but an insufficient measure in this field. Important issues have been left unanswered and unclear in this Act which should be considered by legislators in any future revision of it.
    Keywords: Embryo donation, Infertility treatment, Islamic law, legislation, Third party reproduction}
نکته
  • نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شده‌اند.
  • کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شده‌است. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال