نشریه علوم سیاسی
سال بیستم شماره 2 (پیاپی 78، تابستان 1396)

The major concern of the present article is the investigation of the dimensions and the trend of the effect of political theological disputes as one of the main factors on the political campaigns during the development of Islamic Republic of Iran system. Accordingly, it has been taken advantage of Skinner method in order to investigate the objective and subjective grounds as well as the classification of David Sanders on the static and fluctuating facets to study the effect of disputes over the political campaigns so that the conditions of developing the theological political disputes and the political campaigns during the development of Islamic Republic is investigated. The most significant theological political disputes of this era are the political dimensions of unity, universalism or comprehensiveness, legitimacy, Islam and national sovereignty. The change of regime and government, peaceful and violent challenges are considered as the four facets of impressionableness from the theological disputes. In this regard, the codes of conduct are considered as the direct effect of majority, the political approaches and status as the direct effect of minority, the development of new political parties as the indirect effect of majority and political events as the indirect effect of minority. The present article illustrates that this era is the observant of the increase in the political campaign as well as the increase of chaos in it due to the increase of theological political disputes

According to the issue in relation with writing siasatnameh or government book in thehistory of political thought in the middle centuries of Iran, the article is to review the intellectual foundations of this trend and considering five principal factors, it is to clarify their conceptual aspects in the texts related to theologue and government book. These five elements are divine majesty, justice, togetherness of religion and politics,ashah and ideal monarch. In this regard, the article has endeavored to investigate these concepts towards the identification of their components and to illustrate the way of their dependency on one another.
The hypothesis of this article is that the collection of these concepts is not theelements separate from each other; moreover, there is a kind of systematic relationship between them so that in each concept, there exist the meanings of other concepts being of imperceptible presence but identifiable.

The present discourse of caliphate has selected jihad as the main action towards fighting with the international order and this occasion has been the cause of one of the most important difficulties in regard with the international relations during the two recent decades. Regardless of the importance of issue, the endeavors towards the study and clarification of this situation have not been efficient. These studies have been rather behind appreciating the international entity of jihadi behavior related to the religious entity and the historical antecedent.The present research is to realize the international entity of jihadi groups and their unmanageable act in the domain of universal policy. The purpose is to develop a logicalrelationship between the historical antecedent and the present international function. Consequently, it is presented an explanation from the entity of contemporary jihad as a new and unique state in the present time. It is regarded a phenomenon having been manifested as a critical factor in the domain of international relationship. To do this important issue, the topics have been organized in two levels. In the first part, it has been pursued the genealogy of jihad and in the second part, it has been considered The methodology of study is discourse theory.

One of the fundamental issues of the political and international theory from the past to the present has been the way of developing the morale of eternal peace and security in the domain of internal and comprehensive dominion through a new approach.
According to the perspective of universal era, the issue of reliable peace has been diminished and the emergence of this frail peace within the international system has attracted the attention of outstanding thinkers such as Jurgen Habermas, Michael Walzer, John Rawelz, and Derrida. In this regard, the author of the present writing defends his hypothesis and states that there exists the possibility of presenting a theory towards an eternal peace in the present pluralistic world.
Prior to presenting and defending the hypothesis and on the basis of the thinkers’ viewpoints, the article refers to the current challenges in the world and discusses four fundamental principles.
The research method is descriptive - analytical and it has taken advantage of critical -standard theory to actualize the peace in nonwestern level in line with the cooperation of pluralistic cultural elements in the world.

British liberal-philosopher John Stuart Mill, in his book On Liberty, based on the notion of harm, sought to provide and present a Liberty-Limiting Principle towards limiting the domain of authority and the interference of government in the private domain of citizens and the determination / limitation of the boundaries of individual freedoms that today called “The harm principle.
The efforts and reflections of J.S. Mill in this and his inventive principle, although widely praised or accepted, have been considered as one of the pivotal principles of liberalism. Since the design and formulation, but the concept of harm and content of this principle is always controversial and even some libertarian advocates, after acknowledging the shortcomings and deficiencies, sought to reconsider and provide a consistent and coherent version of this principle. In this paper, after referring to Mill’s presuppositions in the formulation and development of harm principle, The basis and claim of this principle have been reviewed and criticized, and its place in the structure of the Mill’s liberal and utilitarian approach has been examined

The Islamic revolution stated the renewed authority of religion in various domains of life including government while the appropriate declaration of relationship between religion and government within the formal and informal patterns has not been successful and it has been along with theoretical and practical challenges. The aim of this article is the presentation of a strategy towards the interaction between the religion and government via thecorrelational action in the public domain as well as the interactive democracy away from the domination of authority and wealth. Through the analytical approach, the article states the critical theory on the basis of the communicative action and suggests the exchange of idea in the public domain to provide the interaction between religion and government in regard with the ambiguous and complicated affairs along with the public satisfaction.

The collapse of Ekhvani government of Egypt leaded by Mohammad Morsi following the coup detat of the army in 2013 has challenged this government and generally the future of Islam in this country.
The present writing is to investigate the status of Ekhvan following coup detat, various trends in this organization as well as the possibility and way of its breaking down in this organization. Besides the classification of the current tendencies and the internal classification of ekhvan, it is to answer the question related to the possibility of renewed development of Ekhvan. Furthermore, it investigates the possibility of alteration of Ekhvan as well as the amendment in the paradigm of action of this group towards the Islamic jihadi radicalization.
The present writing is to study the effect of these variables including the internal, regional and international factors on the future and organization of Ekhvan.
Accordingly, it briefly considers Ekhvan’s effort in relation with the international orientation. Lastly, it investigates the scenarios of this group pertaining to the internal policy of Egypt following the consideration of how and why of the possibility of organizational detachment in Ekhvan group and potential of its divisions.
The research method is of library type done by the analysis of primary texts and documents, the discourse of major characters of Ekhvan, interviews with people, Ekhvani people in charge as well as the political elites of Egypt.
In accordance with this writing, the utilization of a specific theory towards the recognition of present circumstances will not be helpful.
Considering the multidimensional and plural entity of the present study, the researcher suggests the necessity of a reflective- analytical- descriptive approach towards developing a model related to the reason of present situation without relying on a specific theory