فصلنامه روش شناسی علوم انسانی
پیاپی 96 (پاییز 1397)

The subject of this research is in which way we can name the part of philosophies or part of the philosophical research into Islamic philosophy. Although in naming something a little relation is sufficient, but in this research we attempt to bring significant relation for this naming. Therefore, this reason is placed on a law of definition: as the definition must be inclusive and exclusive, and equally cover its subjects and equally exclude the other subject, the criterion of the present naming can also be include Islamic philosophies and put other philosophies away. The chosen hypothesis in this article, not only is in accordance with the mentioned law but also possible to be added by more contents

In this research, the methodology of studies in the field of security has been developed. The present research is based on the objective of the developmental research and on the nature of the category of exploratory research. The method of data collection; the field and its tools have been interviewed by experts.
Using qualitative research method and in order to discover the subject, targeted interviews with 20 key experts and experts were conducted using snowball sampling. Then, using the Delphi strategy and deep interviews, the methodology of security studies and the final model was configured.
This research outlines the basic assumptions of a new method of inclusive prediction. The research findings indicate that "methodology" of security studies is the result of the effect and influence of various philosophical, organizational, methodical, social, and individual factors. The results of the research showed that it could be inspired by the approach of competitive values ​​and the placement of philosophical schools in the coordinate axes of that method of amoebic analysis for security studies.

In this paper, we propose a tool-supported approach for carrying out the literature review in behavioral science research. Review of literature has proved to be a problematic stage for researchers, especially for early career ones. In this model, both a technological tool and a few conceptual tools are introduced such as activity system model, PRISMA model, a model for inclusion and exclusion of literature and a model for search phrases. This technological-conceptual model is then integrated with a model for scoping review and finally, an example illustrates the whole procedure. In addition to simplifying the job of literature review, the model presented in this paper provides a solid ground for systematic study of the literature, a thematic analysis of that, exploring contradictions and conflicts in the literature to picture future steps in that domain and for a clear and comprehensive illustration of the subject under study in the literature

This article has attempted to make it possible to compare and analyze different theories of Islamic art and architecture based on their methodological commonalities and differences. The theories are collected using the "documentary" method and their roots, abilities and limitations have classified, criticized and analyzed through Islamic theoretical framework.
The historiographical, traditional, and semantical methods do not have the ability of deserving a theory to be called “Islamic” and the ability of formation of Islamic art and architecture, and do not refer to the "valid resources", Textualist methods deal with resources by “invalid methods” and suffer from a variety of analogies and allegories. Individual jurisprudence, despite being well-equipped with resources and methods, is not equipped with a tool for discovering the relationship between social rules and the control of subject recognition. And the method of the jurisprudence of the systems, which eliminates this defect of individual jurisprudence, requires a logic that establishes the coordination between the methods of subject matter recognition and the Fiqh methods (which used to deliver the sentence of the subject matter). The logic that can be exploited using the findings of the “philosophy of system of guardianship.”.

Based on Shi'a thought, the practical tradition is one of the sources of inference that has not been considered by scholars due to the lack of explanation of the foundations and methods of its use. One way to increase the use of the practical tradition of inference is to explain the beliefs that their acceptance brings more effective practice. The present research has attempted to explain a fundamental belief based on the implications of the practical tradition based on an analytical-exploratory method and, by explaining the consequences of its adoption, to develop methods of deduction from the current tradition. Believing in the independent signification of the practical tradition is one of the effective presuppositions in the development of an inference from the practical tradition, the result of which is the extension of the methods of deduction from the practical tradition in two ways: one: the extraction of the dominant principle and the two: revitalization