فصلنامه ذهن
سال هفدهم شماره 3 (پیاپی 67، پاییز 1395)

Universal intellect is an essence that does not belong to bodies not for substance like accidents¡ not for action and possession like individuals and not in particularity and fusion like material Form. Theologians as Allama Toosy have known intellect as Fact Of form and mind sentences because of it’s knowledge extent And scope and its storage in regard to intellectual perception. When Allama Helly enjoyed Allama Toosy Company he criticized the theory necessary of theologians¡ statement according to which false form have part in demiurge. Allama Toosy''s statement and Allama Helly''s critique¡ his student¡ returned to be the prologue to the one of the most important philosophical argument and made philosophers and theologians to reflect and to find a solution to the problem of surrounding knowledge of Demiurge on the false sentences. In this paper¡ after explaining¡ evaluating¡ and study of the most significant solutions¡ an existential analysis based upon transcendent theosophy to solve the problem of surrounding knowledge of Demiurge on the unreal¡ false forms and sentences.

The question of knowledge¡ followed by immediate knowledge is one of the most important issues in the field of ontology and epistemology that basically talked about. Following immediate knowledge in matters due to religious teachings related to the material subjects has greated Islamic philosopher’s incentive to this problem. According as¡ immediate knowledge to material things in the face of presence and absence of its components¡ has added the certitude and importance of this issue. Analysis of Immediate knowledge in the material under two headings: «immediate knowledge of materials and immediate knowledge to materials» and then¡ conflict resolution between science and material¡ by showing of immateriality and materiality relativity¡ are achievements that I put them in this study according to transcendental philosophy. Tabatabai with an emphasis on the principle of this solution but with a different approach has solven this conflict.

Heart as one of the most important words has been introduced for cognition and faith in Quran. Allameh Tabatabaee has not considered the word of heart mentioned in Quran as black poplar heart beating in chest¡ but he believes that the heart mentioned in Quran is same spirit or soul of human. He believes that Quran has mentioned the heart in different meanings including wisdom¡ soul and spirit and terms like as soul and chest have been used as heart. According to his view¡ difference in Quran interpretations never means the difference in ontology. Accordingly¡ heart has different positions and performances. This study has aimed to mention interpretative views of Allameh Tabatabaee about cognitive performances of heart. First¡ the heart meaning has been investigated from the view point of scholars of wordmongers. Then¡ cognitive performances including wisdom¡ hearing¡ science¡ divine revelation¡ prayer¡ and jurisprudence have been extracted from Tafsir-Al-Mizan and relation between heart and them has been analyzed separately. Each performance leads to increasing the heart perception through processes mentioned in this study.

The first step to achieve the Quran teachings is accurate recognition of its words meaning. In recent years with the spread of semantics approach in Qur''anic studies¡ a new method has emerged in this area. The purpose of this method is to explore the meaning which is hidden within the layers of the text so that the precise and comprehensive meaning of the intended word could be extracted through Qur''an''s terms. The most famous of these methods is the Izutsu''s. This paper¡ first of all¡ tries to investigate the word «Kabad» lexically and semantically using his method as well as its completion in sections of verses relationship in the range of Surah and Quran and tries to analyze it in several stages by the use of words with close meaning¡ antonym and structural balancing of the text¡ and has come to the conclusion that contrary to common sense of the word Kabad¡ this word does not have a negative meaning and refers to the limitations of the material world and divine wisdom at human being''s disposal.

One of the prominent issues in contemporary philosophy is the meaning of life. Many philosophers have discussed about the value of life’s meaning and the aim of creation¡ but today ¡the life has lost it’s meaning and now ¡ it is a main question that what the meaning of life is. For the first time¡ this question raised by the continental philosophers¡ but nowadays¡ it is the local point of analytic philosophers. There factors play a main role in the analysis of life: 1) The aim of life 2) The function of live 3) The value of life Although in this article attempt has been made to explain the different approaches in this respect¡ but one main question is remained to be answered¡ is there any value for the continuation of life? In other words¡ dose the human life have any value by itself or we have to invent any meaning for it? Some researchers have put forwarded the mosaic system of life which is dealt in this article.

Many Worlds theories in contemporary physics were controversial theories. Based on these theories there exist a multitude of other universes with which we have no contact and never will have. The discussion of multiplicity of worlds¡ which has a philosophical nature has not just allocated to contemporary physics and is a historical idea. It is said that the contemporary Multiverse is scientific and so differs from it’s predecessors. Our historical survey of these theories shows that in any time there are basic elements derived from physical principles accepted in that horizon of history¡ which have shaped the idea of polarity of worlds. Therefore the contemporary Multiverse theories and their earlier versions are similar from this point of view and the type of world’s plurality depends on theorists’ conceptual horizon in history. The aim of this study is to look at the new Multiverse theories at their historical context and to show the knowledge aspects of the multiverse theories and their dependence to the conceptual horizon and the perspective of the observer.