پژوهش نامه انتقادی متون و برنامه های علوم انسانی
پیاپی 48 (آبان 1396)

One of the most important subjects for investigation in the humanities, especially in philosophy and theology, is the comparative investigation. Today in many countries, comparative philosophy is an independent discipline that has for itself different especial method and investigators. In the Islamic Republic of Iran too after the Islamic Revolution, many thinkers tried to investigate on comparative subjects and published different books and articles about this subjects and also about the comparative philosophy itself. Dr. Mahdi HaeriYazdi is one the contemporary Islamic thinkers that has investigated in comparative philosophy by publishing different books and articles in this area. In this article we try to re-study one of his books about comparative philosophy, by a critical approach. The book that in our aim here is “HerameHasti” (Pyramid of Being).In this book, Haeri try to notice to some philosophical problems, by a comparative approach between Islamic philosophy and western philosophy and logic. In this article we try to show that his book has some internal and methodical defects although has different merits for comparative investigations in philosophy, theology and logic.

This article tries to consider critically Modern and Postmodern the End of History by Ali Moradkhani and then to review it. The topic of Endism is one of many new issues that in the late twentieth century, especially with Fukuyama, have risen in academic circles. This issue has been, explicitly or implicitly, stated in philosophy of modern and postmodern in this book, but the author wants to make clear it under title of "end of history". This article is composed of two parts: The first part of this article refers to the shortcomings of the content of the book and it can be said that the style of its writing and translation is translating type which prevails in this book and we referred to some of them in our article. In other words, much of the book is a translation of the sources of the book which is often referred to them.Second part of article considers formal shortcomings of book such as cover of book, content list, references, endnotes, etc and somewhere we propose samples instead of them.

Philosophy of Eshraq is represented as new and illustrative thought in history of Islamic philosophy. Study about Islamic philosophy is not completed without Studying Philosophy of Eshraq. The book describes and analyzes wisdom of Eshraq as illuminating fundamental principles of the Eshraq philosophy. The current book describes and analuzes Philosophy of Eshraq concentrating “Hikmat al – Eshraq” book. For this purpose, the author has offered Judgments of Sheikh Eshraq About subjects of the philosophy that in fact are considered as Sheikh Eshraq replies to Masha, and he Has analyzed them. In this essay, we introduce the book and indicate backgrounds of such books and analyze content and formal dimensions. In order to it’s assessment and critique, we indicate negative and positive aspects and suggest points to improve it.

Islamic thought 1 ; the book has written for bachelor students of all fields and edited for 97 times; is seeking to examination of three important doctrinal principal i.e human, God and resurrection; but unfortunately it has unused from great Islamic intellectuals opinions for example Avicenna, Abu Hamid al-Gazali, Leader of Illumination and Mulla Sadra . composites of this book have presented your own accepted opinions with theological attitude and (with) very weak reasons. when they understand the weakness of traditional theology reasoning and even can not provide a proof for it, they use from terms and some reason of transcendental wisdom, while this way is caused for contradictions in represented opinions. The writer of this article believe that in this books presented any thought and any Islam of great intellectuals like Mulla-Sadra.

Thematic interpretation of the Quranic versesis interpretation that helps to create a comprehensive and in-depth understanding impression of the subjects of the Quran. Author of the book of Creation in the HolyQuran rote a case study about creation verses with the "School of literary interpretation" method. He compared modern and traditional interpretations face cosmology theories, to obtain understanding of new world necessity and so faithfully reaction to scientific success. He used author-based hermeneutic method against text-based without following the specific school. It is research that opens new horizon in interpretation issues. So review with a critical view can helps to improve it. Therefore, in this paper, after introducing the book and provide a summary of its content, in addition to analyzing method of the author, expressed some structural and content features and offered suggestions to fix flaws.

Great importance of two fields of religion and morality necessitates the study of their relation. Religion and morality contribute to each other in many cases. However, in some cases religious and moral propositions seem to be incompatible. Therefore, profound philosophical research is required to investigate possible relations and conflicts of these two fields. Religion and Morality (An Investigation into Types of Morality's Dependence on Religion) has studied these issues and since this work is used as a textbook for students of philosophy of morality and philosophy of religion in master's level, it should be critically analyzed. The method we have applied in this article is library research while also analytic. First the necessity of this research has been pointed out. Next, this book has been analyzed in terms of its form and its advantages and disadvantages have been mentioned. Later, the book has been investigated in terms of its content mentioning its advantages and disadvantages in this respect as well. Finally, some suggestions have been provided for the improvement of this work.

The logical positivism was the name of radical empiricism that formed in Viena by inspiration of persons like Hume,Russell , Witgenstein and others in 1920 and then entered into England by Ayer via his The language,True and Logic.The main claim of this philosophical movement is to exclude metaphysics as a kind of knowledge.Spokesmans and agents of this way of thinking by accepting Hume’s division of propositions into Analytic and synthetical,are believed that not only metaphysics but theology and morals can not be counted as scientific mental actions. The writer of logical positivism tried by means of translation of some articles represents and critics its main doctrins like verifiability.

Present paper tries to introduce, criticize and survey the Persian translation of the 4th volume of The Routledge History of Philosophy: The Renaissance and Seventeenth-century Rationalism, translated by Hasan Murtazawi. The ten volumes Routledge History of Philosophy provides a chronological survey of the history of Western philosophy, from its beginnings in the sixth century BC to the present time. It discusses all major philosophical developments in depth. The philosophy discussed in this volume covers a period of three hundred and fifty years, from the middle of the fourteenth century to the early years of the eighteenth century: the birth of modern philosophy. The chief topics are Renaissance philosophy and seventeenth-century rationalism—in particular Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz. This volume has been published 1993 by Routledge and translated into Persian and published 2014 in Iran. The author wants to introduce this ten vols. history in general and the 4th one in particular to Persian readers. Then, we go on the Persian translation and will try to review and criticize it in both form and content

In the present essay we study the Persian Translation of Routledge History of Philosophy:Renaissance and Seventeenth-century Rationalism. This work is volume 4 of ten ones and published first time in 1993 by Routledge. Editor of this book is J. R. A. Parkinson. Persian translator of the book is Seyyed Mostafa Sharaeeniwith the editorship of Hassan Fathi and in Iran first published in 1392.
After a brief introducing the English text, our studying divided to two parts: 1- Study on the formal aspect of the Persian translation and 2- Study on the material aspect. For the both aspects we compare some pages of Persian translation with the original text at random. Our relative conclusion is this: Persian translation is credible, understandable and useful for Iranian students of philosophy. Experience and expertise of Persian translator and his attention to the philosophical terms are mainly from factors that make his translation as an academic reliable work. Of course there are some unwanted slips that their correcting depicts ethical task and philosophical originality of translator against readers.

This article is a critical review of the book “An overview ofthe Philosophy of Science”. The importance of this book is due to being the first Persian book in this field. What we confront in introduction increases its importance: This book can be used as a textbook or even self-study book. In this review, first, the approach of this book to topics as induction, methodologies, and realism as well as the weights are given to each one and their clarity and ambiguity will be surveyed. Then, some further notes like what is necessary for a textbook and this book lacks, as summary of each chapter and questions for further thinking, will be noticed. Finally, a conclusion and evaluation of the book and its purposes will be presented.