نشریه مطالعات فهم حدیث
سال چهارم شماره 2 (پیاپی 8، بهار و تابستان 1397)

There are three types of narratives in the old sources about the verse 41 surah al-Hijr: "He (Allah) said: This is for Me the Right Path". The first one seeks to adapt this verse to its objective purpose i.e. Imam Ali that many examples of it found in narrative interpretations. The second one observes four different readings of the verse that have literary justification, but the reading of the verse that affirmed with the same verses and the general context of the Quranic verses and has a right and valid narration, is the common reading of the Holy Quran. The third one contains a reading of the verse in which the name of Imam Ali has been clearly mentioned. These narratives are not satisfied and convinced that Imam Ali is an interpretative variant of the verse but seeking to provide a reading of the verse in which the name of Imam Ali is the appearance of the verse's word. This reading of the verse, among some Shias, has been a pretext for the illusion of distorting the Holy Quran. In this paper, using the methodology of analyzing of chain ''Sanad'', content analysis, and measuring and evaluation of data, we arrived at this none of these narratives of recent category has the necessary qualifications for claiming that the Holy Quran has been distorted.

In Shia's book, there are narrations about the occurrence of Badaa in Ismail, the great son of Imam Sadiq. A group has hanged these hadiths as a pretext for sectarianism, and other group has argued to these hadiths for doubting the basis of Shia Imamat, a third group also referred to them for denying Badaa's belief. Therefore, this investigation with descriptive-analytic study sought to answer this question that what is the analysis of the narrations of the Badaa in Imamate Ismail bin Sadiq? To answer the question related narratives (seven narratives) have been gathered and classified in two categories: specified and unspecified. The theme of the first category narratives clearly revealed the occurrence of the Badaa in the Imamate of Ismail. Beyond the weakness of the document, their content was criticized by many reasons and they were identified as fake. The content of narratives of the second category did not indicate the occurrence of the Badaa in Imamate. These narrations also had a weakness in the document, but if they are meant to be in the people's view of the Imamate of Ismail or Badaa in his killing, there is no difficulty in accepting them.

Science of Rijal is one of the sciences that provide the basis of the authenticity of hadith. Therefore, the group of Quranism (Qur'āniyyun), which is considered to be an opponent of the Sunnah, raises some of its doubts and problems into this science. These problems can be classified in two domains: the first is related to the problems that arise from the principle of the Science of Rijal, such as the interference of personal feelings in the curtailment of narrators and the lack of knowledge of their inner states, and second is related to doubts about the science of Shia Rijal, and most of them were presented by Yahya Muhammad in the book of Moshkilah al-Hadith. Some of them are as follow: lack of sense in the narrator's adjustment due to the time gap between the religious communities and the age of the innocent, the shortage and failure of the Shiite scholar's expressions about the narrators and, ultimately, the conflict between the views of the Shiite Hadith scholars. In this paper, because of variety transmitted and rational reasons, we show that these doubts and bugs do not have the necessary resistance and strength to challenge the science of Rijal. As a result, a systematic review and targeted response to these doubts are the main goal of this research.

The sermon of Ghadir as one of the most important and last words of the Prophet contains important messages and its study is necessary to become familiar with the nature of the Islamic religion and its main pillars. Nevertheless, the historical narration of this sermon in three different volumes, as well as differences in some of their themes and expressions, has necessitated the analysis and review of the content of these texts. In this research, we tried to use the interdisciplinary and novel research methods, first, each of the three texts reported as Ghadir's sermon was analyzed separately, secondly, by comparing the three texts, the degree of similarities and differentiations and layers of consonant and inconsistent determination And, thirdly, by providing quantitative and qualitative analyzes, the necessary preconditions for criticizing the content of this sermon, as well as entering into discourse analyzes, to identify the production time of each of the three sermons and the historical context of their publication. For this reason, using the method of "content analysis" as one of the methods for analyzing the text, in the first step, with the technique of "thematic analysis", each of the sermons as an independent text, was accurately and deeply identified and analyzed in step The second is using comparative comparisons of these texts with the help of the method of "thematic deep structural search" and we have identified consonant and incompatible layers.

One of the important issues in contemporary text criticism is the question of the language of the text and the role and importance of it in understanding and evaluating texts. The basic topics in this area are how to study the language of the text. The present paper proposes a way to study the language of it based on the issue of implicit information in the process of quoting in a historical speech. In the beginning, the study of Hadith's language with theological and linguistic introduced. In the linguistic approach it has investigated the implicit information as a literary matter and then as a linguistic one. In the next step, the most important factors in the creation of implicit information from the linguistic point of view investigated and tried to indicate the entry of this feature in the texts of narratives. The results of this research show that the application of linguistic topics in the theological studies of can open new windows in the hadith studies.

Hariz bin Abdullah Sajestani is present in the documents of 1320 narrations. According to main narrations books, Hariz quoted 200 narrations, most of which are basis of jurisprudential sentences. In the meantime “Mohammad bin Amro Kashi” and “Abul Abbas Najashi” quoted from Younis as saying that Hariz did not directly hear more than one or two narrations from Imam Sadegh. This report causes some famous jurists and recent experts of Rejal science to ignore Hariz’s with-no- mediator narrations and to take them as “mursal narrations”. The current study aims to explain the directness or indirectness of quotation in this piece of mentioned narrations document while using documentary method and inductive analysis; then this paper comes to the conclusion that Younis’ claim is not right. To show this matter, there are two reasons: (1) the document of Kashi’s and Najashi‘s narrations was not intact and (2) some evidences, which are found in Hariz’ method for direct quotation from Imam Sadegh, show that Hariz personally quoted at least 18 narrations while using “auditory method” to directly quote from Imam Sadegh. Hence, restriction made by Najashi and Kashi is unreliable; consequently it cannot be taken as opposition to with-no- mediator narration in Hariz’s direct quotation.

Despite the fact that the exegetical traditions have been noticed from various perspectives, but the analysis of their dimensions and components is among the new researches in the scene of tradition researches which intends to discover the contextual elements of this category of traditions through methodological studies in the motifs of exegetical traditions. As resorting to the Quran and Tradition is based on understanding these two valuable weighty things, thus the present research is an attempt to consider the ideological components and exegetical traditions of ýSurah al-Muminun in the Shiite traditional exegeses by the use of content method analysis, inductive method and the analysis unit of the tradition motif. Furthermore, it tries to answer this question that based on exegetical traditions of Surah al-Muminoon, which of the ideological basic elements have been employed by the infallible Imams to enhance and orient human towards perfection. Classifying the ideological motifs of exegetical traditions thematically, this research deals with an analysis of the basic beliefs in ýSurah al-Muminunto display finally the basic structure ruling the exegetical traditions of ýSurah al-Muminun in the ideological dimension.