مجله پژوهش های ادب عرفانی (گوهر گویا)
سال دهم شماره 2 (پیاپی 31، پای ی ز و زمستان 1395)

Rumi, in the course of his development, had always had a companion beside him. Each of these partners had a major and specific role in his educational elevation. Among these influences, the role ofHusam al-Din Chalabias his last companion has been always concealed behind the veil of Rumi's exaggerated praise of him in Masnavi, thus making Husam's contribution to Rumi's spiritual exaltation very difficult to trace.
This article seeks through an analysis of Husam's characteristics and personality traits, to elucidate his special relationship with Rumi and consequently reveal the impact of Husam's presence on Rumi.

The appearance of deconstructive thoughts and notions of Ibn Arabi made a suitable field for epistemological discourse in Islamic Sufism and opened a new point of view for the seekers of meanings specially Muslim Occulticism. The scatter of his audacious notions in the world of Islam made the different groups of his followers and opposes to criticize his notions and appreciated or rejected them. The critics of Sheikh Akbar were mostly belonged to juristic rather than Sufism, yet in the Sufism person like Alaodole Semnani criticized and scrutinized his notions, but in Sufism no one criticized Ibn Arabi more than Sheikh Ahmed Sarhendi. Sarhendi raised the idea of “unity intuition” oppose to Ibn Arabi’s “unity of existence” and crenellated the pillars of this theory. Researchers in Iran knows him mostly of this notion, but his opposition to Sheikh Akbar is not merely about this notion and it includes the attitudes like curatorship and prophecy, the seeing of God, the Names and Qualification of God, the causation of God’s actions, eternal suffering of kaffirs and other argumentative issues seriously challenged Sheikh Akbar. This article tries to investigate the differences of the notions of these two effective and prominent figures.

Contemplation on language as the main indicator of ideas and mystic beliefs is so important. Hallaj is one of the mystics whose lingual symbols in his works and words has distinct his language from common language. It is needed to be analyzed due to find his mental and experimental approaches. This paper seeks to survey Hallaj’s lingual symbols in three parts: letters, words and pictures in a descriptive-analytic way; and before that, it will explain the symbols and its direct relationship with Hallaj's mystical experience. The role of symbol in Hallaj’s language, relation of his symbolic language with his spiritual experiences and its role on recognition of his experiences and thoughts will be analyzed in this paper. According to the subtle differences between Shat’h and symbol, discovering Hallaj’s lingual symbols reveal the kind of his experiences and beliefs. Shath and symbol in language are the main and most significant part of Hallaj’s words and Shat’hiat has been considered in his languages more, so analyzing the symbols in his words is necessary.

The issue of veils concerned in the way to perfection, its identification, and the ways to surpass it is among the significant subjects in practical Gnosticism and gnoticists has a special view on that on their way to perfection. The issue of gnostic veils is one of the essential subjects that Abo Abdolah Nafri, a Shia gnosticist, was concerned. Koranic verses and Imams sayings include some points on this as well. Nafri, while focusing on the subjects of veil and its kinds has mentioned his especial views on it in “Almamavaghef o Almokhatebat”.
In this article attempt is made to elaborates Nafri’s views and ideas on different kinds of veils and the main ones, along with the main causes and finally the resolutions with reference to his book and other gnostic scripts. With regard to Nafari’s unique style of writing, the present study explain the position of veils on the way to perfection from this scholar viewpoint. Nafri offers different concepts and classification on this issue. Some of the veils is his creation and for some, he paid more attention. He also used current contemplation of his time for his work on veil.

Savanehol-oshag and lamaat belong to the theses which have been composed based on two different Gnostic approaches. The relative differences in the author's mental bases, their regard to Gnostic concepts and terms, have influenced their works to high degrees. Since the concept "insight" and its types and ranks has a strong relationship with author's Gnostic ideology and mental disposition, insight elements and the related issues were studied in this research emphasizing two above mentioned works. Reflection on the concept of "human" and "God" insight as insight pillars in the first Gnostic tradition and "human", "existence", and "God" insight in the second Gnostic tradition indicated that "insight" like other Gnostic terms has common points and discrepancies considering the concept in two studied works. The human and his insight as a common point in both Gnostic traditions is a master key which facilitates the achievement to further stages of insight and existence insight makes the achievement of god insight possible relying on thought of unitism and intuition force. In conclusion, the insight into unity nature is not possible because of God absolute, eternity refusal, lordship certainty, and possibility constraints and the insight into righteousness, the knowledge of God's unity and praise, can be accomplished successfully through names and attributes.

This study is a meditation in Hojviri’s Apparoch about Hallaj that based on his implicit Comments. By analysis of evidences, research structure was offered in nine part: acquaintance history between Hojviri and Hallaj, Hojviri’s apparoch to agree and disagree views about Hallaj, Hallaj relationship with suifis and the reason of their denial, Motivation plan of another Hallaj, Hallaj and Mlamtyh, Rejection of Hallaj Transduction Belief, Rejection of Hallaj magic accusation, Proofing dignity of Hallaj, unacceptable opinions of Hallaj.

Sepehri is one of famous contemporary poets that It has been said a lat about his poems, especially about his mystical thoughts. There are several views about his poems sush as: whit persian Islamic mystical principles, whit Hindi and Eastern mystical principles, or without any Mysticism. No study has particalary dealt with comparative analysis of mystical terms and concepts in Sepehri s poems compared With Muslim mystics ones. Word selection is a way toward poet s manner of Thinking, Therefore, the researcher belives that selecting mystical terms and concepts in Sepehri s poems is a suitable way analyze his mysticism. In order to lighten the nature and quality of his Mysticism, this study selects mystical concept of Love from among so mony mystical terms and concepts in his poem. It also tries to express It real meaning compared with the use of this concept by Muslim mystics. This study tries to show the origin of Sepehri s mysticism by analyzing the differences of Love between his poems and Mysticism of Muslim mystics.