نشریه قرآن پژوهی حسنا
پیاپی 2 (پاییز 1388)

There are some cases in the Quranic verses that the word which is referred to and the adverting word have the same contents by the conjunction))او ((., In other words, the two words among which there is))او ((bear the same meaning. On the other hand, the demand of the word))او ((. is to distinguish between the two words: Here is the point where the problem is created A group of the commentators have presented a solution that a kind of changes should be brought about in order to distinguish betweenthe meaning of the word which is referred to and the adverting. word; no matter if it is without any indication This writing has presented a second solution and has proved that inthe above mentioned cases it would be wrong to bring about changes in the word which is referred to and the adverting word, rather the word))او ((means واو and واو is the commentary conjunction, as a result the commentators have commented tens of Quranic verses. clearly, and rubbed off their ambiguity.

Some words in addition to the basic meaning, have relative meaning as well.))مع ((is a word which is used in the Qoran in two basic and relative semantic domains. This writing tries to express three kinds of absolute, desirable and undesirable company afterit mentions the basic meaning of))مع ((. And it also tries to express two meanings ((aid and help)) and ((knowing and to be conversant in)) and some of the Quranic uses of))مع ((in order to express the relative meaning of))مع ((through structural semasiology which studies semantically relations between the words and the sentences and study the meaning((after, then)) which is used about one of the on the basis of historical approach)5and6, Quranic uses (Ensherah to the structure of meaning and semantically changes(the change of) content

This verse blames the person who was in company with the prophet of Islam on that historical night(whether it was the first caliph or not) in two respects, this writing intends to organize these two respects in two parts with complete relying on contextual and oral evidences and making no metabasis to the evidences beyond the texts; In thefirst part, the reader will find out through the oral significations that the verse testifies that the prophet’s companion, being seriously fearful in that historical night, was leading the prophet to a dangerous position and if the descending of the divine quietude and assistance of the divine army were not there the history of Islam might have been different today. And also in the second part, the incapability of that person to enjoy the divine quietude will become clear by a. simple and understandable question to allThe writer has not relied on any Shiite source or commentary to get help all through this writing in order to argue in the best way.