مجله پژوهشهای میان رشته ای قرآن کریم
سال نهم شماره 1 (پیاپی 18، بهار و تابستان 1397)

During these two decades after the revolution (1357) we have witnessed the application of four fundamental concepts in the scientific literary in Iran, such as: “Islamicization of the science”, “Quran-based Human Sciences”, “Quran-based systematization” and “Quran-based theorization”. Firstly application of “Quran-based systematization” in the document of charter of development of Quranic culture of the country has to some extent propagated the use of this concept. Secondly “Quran-based theorization” is also mentioned in the scientific community and some of the strategic documents, since systematization is dependent on the theorization. The spread of these concepts, shows the rise for scientific revolution in the human sciences. The significant issue on the mind of those who emphasize on functionalization of these concepts is the failure of philosophical and doctrinal sciences in removing the obstacles faced by Islamic communities in achieving divine objectives. Some of the sages, scholars and researches inside or outside the country, have claimed their ideas on these concepts or have written them down. Among the questions raised in this regard are: the exact meaning of these concepts, the strategies for achieving them, the process by which these suggested strategies are fulfilled. The abstract nature of these concepts has made them to be considered as scientific objectives of the Islamic Revolution. These concepts are counted as general and absolute particular and each enjoys primacy to the other. This paper focuses on the four concepts mentioned and also the strategies and processes applied for their fulfilment. It also shows that systematization and production of Quran-based human sciences and Islamicization of sciences, depend on Quran-based theorization. After almost four decades of examining and analyzing the fundamental concepts, we have reached the necessity of Quran-based theorization, while Sayyad Muhammad Baqir Sadr has long ago been one of the pioneers in this field, and has discussed theorization prior to everyone else. This means that we have not made use of his scientific findings and are still remained in the much earlier period.

Systemization in common language and sometimes in scientific discourse have spiritual common meaning for four proof of “system logy” (in genesis field), “finding system” (in legislation field), “making system” (in credits field) and “stablishing system” (in objective field). Although, in particular, “making system” is observing credits and social contracts which, is establish in any sub-system. Hence, the author believed that “making system” with its general meaning is contain all four fields and Holy Qur’an, as a religious epistemology source, is in all four field. According to this, each field is acquired to that field. Furthermore, if the process of “making system” became ignored or did not based on Qur’an principles then the process of solving problems and system’s challenges won’t base on monotheistic realism and idealism. Therefore, different social sub-systems would become panacea for delusive or non-priority issues, imposition and oriented toward non-Islamic ideals. This deviation from religious trusted sources, on one hand, would failed Islamic system in establishing its material and spiritual purposes, which, this would have doubted elites and people of the system through revolutionary identity of Islamic system. And on other hand, this would lead to establishment of social sub-system, autocracy (though small), arrogance (though in a small part) and establishment of secular governance (though smoothly but theorized). The process of “making system” is making credit in form of moving from origin to matters (having brief knowledge through recognizing the basis and giving priority to matters), and moving from matters toward sources (for re-reading) and reforming (re-defining), origins (having lasting knowledge through origins) and finally moving from origins to matters for defining, explaining, sensing and solving problems. Although, must bear in mind that in this movement, which, is detailed and brevity, having inner flexibility for reformation, moving gradually toward evolution is continuation for making system.

Qur’anic systemization as a main function of development system of Qur’anic culture after victory of Islamic Revolution and establishment of Velayat Vaqih system is reflected in idea and speech of religious scholars and take considerable part of their attempt. This article with descriptive - analysis method and with aim of examining Qur’anic systematization’s concept, investigating existing approaches and by searching in meaning of this concept looked into existing and conceived approaches. Moreover, among them, it illustrates the most similar meaning of the concept with development system of Qur’anic culture. In this case, also, the paper has a view on shortcoming and inadequacies of the said approaches. According to contents of this article, Qur’anic systemization means reforming main affairs of human basing on Holy Qur’an principals, and could explain all knowledge’s on frame of this reformation. Therefore, Islamic Ahkam and jurisprudence science are executive requirement of these principals in Human society. In this approach, Qur’anic systemization is the result of reformation in human affairs, this means that Holy Qur’an presents general principals of human societies and other Islamic knowledge’s are illustrating the way of their accomplishment. In this case, jurisprudence also have its own responsibilities which, because of its importance, this article for more explanation pointed out to some samples of the role of jurisprudence knowledge in expending justice and also the principal of tolerance and laxity.

The subject of this research is about affairs that are strategic and important and it have undoubted role in realizing theory of Islamic governance in the world of thoughts. Moreover, possibility of this claim rooted in our expectation from religion and the expanding of religion inference in civil religious human world. Thus, our recognition from Holy Qur’an and Ma’sumin trainings encourage us for proofing this claim, consequently, proving this needs scientific attempt of scholars who are dominated in religious sources and todays human science. This article designed a new political system with its different angles that is picked up from Holy Qur’an as a model for proofing this claim.

Questioning from methodology of approach research of interdisciplinary is a question about development which, in a systematic view and mechanism contain levels of paradigmatic basics, theoretical, conceptual model, operational and discursive level. Moreover, it would be practical in religion via comprehensive system of perception focused on growth-development, in the evolution leadership pattern in two angles of leading comprehensive science and scientific map and with converging on the principal of Velayat Faqih in religion. Furthermore, existing the growth-development expectation from religion, in other words the issue of comprehensive developing, is necessity to have methodological studies of interdisciplinary and multi string based on understanding the progress. Having no alternative, this required three levels of problem ology, theology and forthcoming till with this could utilize from methodology of obtaining in religion and Velayat for managing culture and transition. Passing from approaches of components of knowledge and branch fields to interdisciplinary approaches, especially in Qur’anic studies, wasn’t find its interference paradigm, so this interference paradigm is the knowledge of developing. Furthermore, a reason for inability of entering to knowledgebase is ignoring the interference field. This article with approach of Qur’anic reference (the principal of guided to grow) with utilizing from progressive methodology of responding to a posteriori and research and developing and protective methodologies such as systematic methodology via matrix and algorithmic process tries with expanding Qur’anic thoughts for development (knowledge basis of interpretational Qur’anic school) achieve a methodological aspect of futurist research of Qur’anic developing through better ordering three system of ordinal, revelation and subjective futurist interpretation. In view of that, the article would discuss this interpretational school for modulation of basic model of Islamic developing.