نشریه مطالعات تحول در علوم انسانی
پیاپی 7 (پاییز و زمستان 1395)

Knowledge producing as a space and an apparatus is a significant concerning in modern states in order to obtaining of power and hegemony. Knowledge, particularly in the field of humanities, has create interference with territorial identity in which the more vernacular producing, the more consistency of a history and geography. Therefore, there is a growing concerning about the problem of indigenous knowledge producing equaled with history and territorial identity of Iran’s political unity which of can resist against the “other” and “western” knowledge fields. In this regard, the paper by descriptive-analytical method is going to study of the virtual space role in producing and consistency of humanities circumstances in Iran. The results indicate that the virtual space produces multiple, becoming and un-indigenous identities which aren’t appropriate to meaning based culture and indigenous territory of Iran according to western basement, production field, items and themes. Dominance of virtual space with westernize discourse has reduced the potentialities of Islamic and territorial identity to producing of theory and indigenous humanities at the framework of Iran’s history and Geography.

If modernity with the allegations because it Shnakhtbvdn phenomena, humanism, Ryazyvar look at the world and introduced the identification, postmodernity in the relativity of knowledge, meaning and pluralism crisis can be identified and contemplated. In this article, the claim (Thesis) examined the fact was that postmodernism is a defining fixed and determined not to because of the nature of Bnfknanh postmodernity is concerned, perhaps with a little carelessness can say that Nietzsche and Heidegger, one of the few people who somehow have managed to understand Jamalatrafy of postmodernity are correct. In this article, it was tried to introduce a varied and diverse definitions of postmodernism and a brief review of the ideas of Nietzsche and Heidegger, the lead and the nature of postmodern thought is more evident and obvious. using the methodology of critical hermeneutics Habermas fabric can be analyzed and contemplated the thought of Nietzsche and Heidegger was Zhrfngranh.

The theoretical foundation of the capitalist system has always emphasized on riba transactions and its expansion in human communities. Therefore, the rural and urban spaces of countries that manage whit capitalism pattern, intensively, they are under the influence of the negative economy-social consequences of this issue. The survival of the capitalist system Depends to riba transactions. That's why capitalism system reflected in the shape of mechanic and dualism space. for this reason, capitalism system whit its special mechanism in banks, financial institutions and money markets, etc, guarantees final interest unlimitedly and constantly. But, it has been considered the Action of riba in Islam and According to several Quran verse has been prohibited as war with God and His Messenger. Islam whit knowing limited growth, this is contrary to the principle of "no loss" in Islam and oppression to the society and to any individual or legal "enough" is attached. Islam with knowing ill-gotten of riba moves in integration and homogenous route. On this basis, approach of Capitalism system and Islamic economy to the issue of riba has its spatial consequences. Therefore, differences of this two economic system is Containing of limited and unlimited growth, that in capitalism system leading to spatial dualism and mechanical economic-social relationship Plasticity in space.