The Role of Referring Pronoun to some Common Individuals
Author(s):
Abstract:
Sometimes there comes a pronoun after a common [individual]، which has apparently been used as the object of a legal decision (ḥukm)، and by means of external evidence، the certainty is achieved that this pronoun refers to some common individuals. Then، the question arises as to whether reference of the pronoun to some common individuals would cause its designation or the common generality continues to be valid. In their encounter with the two manifestations existing in the issue، the uṣūlīs (legal theoreticians) have mainly presented three different theories، each one of which brings up a specific jurisprudential corollary: 1. Priority of iṣālat al-umūm (principle of generality) and dominion over pronoun، 2. Abandoning iṣālat al-umūm and asserting the inapplicability of utilization، 3. Theoretical standstill and practical reference to the principles of practice. The present writing explains and examines different views with a comparative study and in eventually approves the second view.
Keywords:
Language:
Persian
Published:
Islamic Jurisprudence & Its Principles, Volume:45 Issue: 93, 2013
Page:
115
magiran.com/p1173395
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یکساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال میتوانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.
In order to view content subscription is required
Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!