The Examination and Critique of Hakim Abd al-Razzaq Lahiji in Good and Evil (Husn wa Gubh) and Included Propositions

One of the most controversial issues in theology, ethic, ethic philosophy and the principle of Islamic jurisprudence sciences which scholars from the ancient Greek by now has noticed is good (husn) and evil (qubh) and the propositions which are comprised. All things have been said about the clauses like justice is good (hasan) and cruelty is evil (ghabih) relate to their definition and whatness and the way of their perception and understanding which have mentioned in the writings of philosophers and theologians dependently (incoherently) and can be seen uncertainty, ambiguousness, sophistry and confusing in different fields. Among them Hakim Lahiji is one of the few philosophers who precisely has explained the debate and analyzed with an artistic separation of conceptology, ontology and epistemology fields of the ethical propositions and correction of antecedents’ beliefs. Meanwhile, it indicates the preliminaries and record of the issue, this paper tries to criticize and explore Hakim Lahiji’s attitude which the most important one is the certainty of good (husn) and evil (qubh) and its included propositions.