Defining the Scope of Impossible Crime

It is possible that despite one enters into the realm of material elements of a crime and completes all material phases or the criminal path the result is not achieved. If the cause of executive operation being ineffectiveness is the impossibility of crime to be realized, the conducted act is considered an impossible crime. So far as most scholars consider So far as most law scholars consider impossible crime, based on this provision, a synonymous to impracticable crime. However, if one looks carefully to all impracticable acts and note the reasons for impossibility of a crime, she would be skeptical in these two being synonymous, as we may distinguish impossible crime from "simply impracticable acts". So we may not consider any impracticable act, an impossible crime under this approach, but the crime is considered an impossible crime when those acts done in order to commit a crime by the end and despite performing executive operations, the crime realization is impossible. Therefore, an emphasize on the necessity of a criminal action being impracticable, has resulted in distinguishing between impossible crime and attempted or abortive crime on the one hand, and the requirement of entering into the executive operations, limits the scope of the impossible crime on the other hand. Article 122 of the Penal Act 1392 AH, provides some criminal reaction against impossible crime, while "simply impracticable acts", due to non-realization of any attempted executions lacks criminal attribute. So it's necessary to have a clear grasp of the concept of impossible crime and distinguish it from impracticable acts. This article distinguishes between impossible crime and any similar acts being simply impracticable, but the condition of entry into executive operation does not exist about them.