Explanation and Evaluation of the Epistemological Proofs of Those Opposing Religious Science

Religious science is an important and extensive subject. One of the main issues in the area of religious knowledge which is worth considering is the investigation of the epistemological proofs and flaws of those who oppose religious science. Therefore, according to the written works and initial induction and examination made in this regard, it has become explicit that the most important epistemological arguments of those who reject religious science, are:1. Production of religious science does not account for defining knowledge as the” justifiable true belief”.2. Impossibility of religious science in the stages of scientific research.3. Relativism of science is concomitant with the notion of religious science.A careful analysis of their arguments shows that their proofs for religious science are insufficient. Some of these proofs are mere claims that are groundless and are incompatible with the realities of history of science and some are based on a kind of unsound reasoning. Finally, the reason their rejection of religious science is the mere claim related to the administration stage of realization of religious science and their unfamiliarity with Islamic sciences and teachings of Islam.