An Analysis on Conflict between Situational-policy-Based Approaches on Cyber Crime Monitoring and User's Privacy

The expansion of information and communication technologies has led to the formation of a new generation of crime, and some crimes has now became easier to commit. application of technology has facilitated the possible delinquency prevention in order to meet this challenge. Despite extensive monitoring features that are designed following expansion of information and communication technologies, it is sometimes very difficult to strike a balance between their use and possible delinquency prevention, and in some cases, over-reliance on them may bring about various dilemmas for users’ data security. As a result, there is always a dual challenge facing the authorities. On the one hand, the supervisory bodies are required to move under general rules, documents and provisions of international and regional privacy advocates, and in the event of any violation, they have international responsibility. On the other hand, they have to provide an atmosphere devoid of criminal opportunities and delinquency prevention. online victimization prevention requires appropriate measures towards the potential crime and the idea of applying them by the judicial authority. Thus, in order to provide a safe space, above-mentioned constraints can not be ignored and potential crime can not be prevented through pervasive surveillance. Hence, in this paper, we investigate alignment or non-alignment of the most popular electronic monitoring measures with human-rights requirements on the protection of privacy and various aspects of their interference with privacy.