Representation Process for Identity of " Self" and " Other" in Beyhaghi's History

In discursive point of view, identity is the achievement of discourse and formed in it. Each discourse is the output of especial discourse and can be understand as a process and gives it a historical aspect and updates it. Since discourse is a fluid and relative fact, identity also is variable. Discourse is the output of science system and linguistic structure and each discourse is dominated over parts of society and formed individual and collective words and deeds by domination over minds. This research, based on Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis theory, had analyzed Beyhaghi’s history in three levels: First, detailed text analysis; Second, interpretation of underlying context; Third, part of social struggle in the form of power relations. The findings of this research shows the characteristics and interaction by which Beyhaghi had formed the “Us” group. Also it shows that by which differences and models he had rejected a group and how Beyhaghi’s political identity had been formed by his description of “Us” and “Other”.