Strategic Examination of Iran and United States after Nuclear Agreement According to Game Theory

After long consultations and negotiations for resolving Iran nuclear issue, both parts approved comprehensive negotiations joint action. After adopting the agreement, the basic significant issue is that the two sides agreed during the talks after what strategies, agreements and obligations be adopted and how and to what extent they are operational, and ultimately realize what the consequences come. On the basis of this assumption, we introduce game theory on the diplomacy after the agreement between Iran and the United States by adopting a strategy of mutual co-operation as the optimum design, the decision. According to the findings of this study, the nuclear diplomacy after an agreement between Iran and the United States, a dynamic game, complete with information and can positive-sum and the win-win game. Then play tree nuclear diplomacy after an agreement between Iran and US and plotted the options facing each and every one of them investigated and went on to find the answer to solving the outcome of the game and the way back into the fine profits as a result of Nash equilibrium and the game was the most logical, and the nicest strategy after the agreement sanctions and mutual commitment to its commitment to the agreement