Explanation of Non- Euclidian pattern in urban planning

With domination of Kant's epistemology and instrumental reason in social science and human geography, interpretation of space have been based on neo physics that often it is equivalent with intuitive and physical experience and the place of capital and it's reproduction. Therefore we firstly have represented of ontological transform of space concept and by the way we enumerate the characters of non- Euclidean pattern in urban planning. Intended purpose of ontological transform of space is the epistemological chaos due to functional transformation and unfolds of another view from existence and the entity of space. Unlike to the past each citizenship, simultaneously have been experienced amongst warp and woof of multi-level spaces in the different functional scales like global, regional, international, national and local. Euclidean geometry discuss about organization of objects in physical space while non- Euclidean pattern in planning imply to collapse of Euclidean world order, sustained beings and standard assumptions that have been dominated on our understanding from world in the two past century. Non- Euclidean pattern in planning is strongly normative and based on values. Conclusion is that this pattern is not based on quantitative indexes such as city decision making based on prediction and pure and limited modeling from vast and qualitative realities of city spaces such as metropolitan but like postmodern thoughts reliance on crisis of grand and modern narratives that had been a base to definition of place and space. Therefore focus on non-geometry pattern of urban planning that it performs decision making and city plans with interference and participation of communities and citizenships. In this process, the hierarchical pattern and from top – to – down that is alongside with Euclidean pattern of planning replaced with network pattern and down- to- up.