Art and Politics; Interaction and conflict areas between art and politics in postmodernism

Postmodernism, with its introduction in the last few decades, has expanded a lot extensive philosophical, ideological and aesthetic discussions and questions. One of the serious questions is interested by many social sciences and political theory thinkers, it is the relation between postmodernism as a school of art and aesthetic that emerged after modernism and the political. According to the postmodern thinkers’ views, this article to fallow the question, whether Unlike Kant, who had spoken about independence and non-objective art, we can speak about political aesthetics and political possibilities of art in the current situation? In order to answer these questions, the authors have drawn some concepts to prove their claim of art politicization and post-modern political aesthetic pattern. These concepts include: the consumptionism in late capitalism, critique of minority policy and political aesthetic in postcolonial discourse. This article has been written by descriptive analysis and has used the critical theory framework of thinkers such as Lyotard, Friedrich Jameson and Michel Foucault.