Based Out of Conflict Judicial Indications Based on Medical Tests With Legal Indications

In the current era ¡ despite the complexity and variety of crimes against humanity, judicial justice without tapping new sources of forensic science and new technologies is somewhat difficult. In the age of information and communication technologies, laboratory data as one of the important examples of evidence of crimes are one of the legal indications due to the progress of science in recent years. The prospect of a new scientific discovery has opened crimes to humanity. In fact, this indication is an indirect reason based eyewitness and vote judge that the result in science is the subject of complaint leading to a decision on the occurrence or non-occurrence of the crime by the accused. Important medical- experimental indications more time that we are looking for answers to these questions that in what form and with what basis come first, legal indications based on laboratory data that primarily are of valid guess. Considering the importance of this issue and assumption of this article based on priority of medical data on legal indications must be specified. This descriptive and analytical article that was set with library tools, reviewed radix of priority of the legal indications based on laboratory data under explain of position of evidence of proof and definition of indications and express aspects of difference of judicial and legal indications and validity of laboratory data in law and jurisprudence and accordingly has proven to be despite of priority intermittent and typical legal indications on judicial indications under normal conditions. Laboratory data serve as judicial indications on legal indications is the first because of science production and more fact finding and of access of reasons of proof in Emam Law and jurisprudence and judge's knowledge validity.