Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Block in Intraoperative Anesthesia and Analgesia in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

Regional techniques both reduce opioid requirements and provide quality pain control in patients, especially in pediatrics.
The aim of this study was to compare the contributions of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric (II/IH) block and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block combined with sedation to intraoperative anesthesia and analgesia in pediatric surgery.
In this randomized controlled study, 100 patients aged 2 - 6 years were enrolled and divided into five groups: TAP block with ketamine; II/IH block with ketamine; TAP block with sevoflurane; II/IH block with sevoflurane; and the control group with sevoflurane alone. Hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR)), depth of anesthesia, sevoflurane usage, pain score, number of children who needed analgesia, and the time to start rescue analgesia of all patients were recorded.
There was nosignificant difference between the study groups, in HR and MAP during operations (P > 0.05). The amount of sevoflurane used in the group supported with both blocks decreased significantly compared to the control group (P This study revealed that transversus abdominis plane or ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric regional blocks could have same intraoperative/ postoperative effects regarding hemodynamics and intraoperative analgesia in lower abdominal pediatric surgery. Anesthesia can be maintained using sedative medicines only.