A Review of the Compensation for Spinal Injuries

The compensation for bone injuries are defined in a set of rules and theories in relation to the limb including that bone. Considering the fact that some  types of bones, including the spine, do not belong to any limbs and  consequently are out of the set of rules, they need separate examination in  order to determine the damages. The spine consists of a set of bones which  like other bones might experience injuries like bruising, fracture, and  dislocation. Altho ugh the religious jurists have separately specified the  compensation for the vertebral column, the categorization has never been  organized enough. The study and discovery of various injuries along with  the damages can be pointed out as expressive insuffici ency of legislator in  criminal law. The spine injuries are accompanied with other relatively  common physical harms like foot numbness, scoliosis etc., and this  distinguishes the spine from other types of bones in the body. In case of  natural or unnatural c omplications to the spine, the use of the term "not  recovery" is one of the ambiguous issues, which in spite of its potential to  derive  a theory from juridical texts, has not been attended to by the  legislator. The present papers tries to study the compensation to the bone  from juridical and law viewpoints, and also to discover administration  difficulties and to propose solutions to it all according to narrative and  juridical sources, while legal referencing is followed in every topic.