Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator

Ontology of Iran's nuclear agreement and 5 + 1 from the point of view of the relation of the structure-operator The agreement between Iran and the P5 + 1, especially the United States, is moderating the behavior of Iran, or can it-or should-it have to go through the process of material change? Basically, interactions in the context of social structures, on the one hand, and the purposes of the brokers on the other hand, should be considered, in addition to the role of social structural infrastructures, the role of superstructures, namely, the implications of government agents of 5 + 1, so that the most important "birth", that is, "agreement" between 5 + 1 and Iran. The explanation of this agreement shows, in essence, which aspects of co-ordination, cooperation, participation, or convergence have been raised? Here's the question of whether the continuation of Iran's cooperation with the West based on the role of social structures-along with the brokers-could be a kind of transition from Hobbesian logic to Lucky or, eventually, the Kantian anarchy? !