Comparative Study of Donald Trump and Barack Obama Foreign Policy in the Syrian Crisis

business position, a comparison of this policy with Obama’s attitude is important. Obama’s foreign policy in Syria has been subject to certain limitations and complexities. The inadequate militant history of Bush’s foreign policy, especially in the Middle East, and the slogan of Obama’s shift in presidential elections are the ones that blocked Obama’s hands on strong action. Obama’s foreign policy in the Syrian crisis managed the complex and expansive crisis of the external and internal crises. Obama’s goals in Syria were to restore the Arab world’s transformations to the liberal- democratic axis and to some extent control of them with the harsh and costly crisis in Syria. He also restored the violent face of the United States in the world and the Middle East, weakened its rivals and enemies, especially the resistance axis, with their energy destruction in Syria, the completion of the larger Middle East process, and the objective realization of the promise of Obama’s change in the presidential election by showing the power of diplomacy and international cooperation totally different from policy of Trump was that it could be said in three words: Syria as a bargaining tool for arms trading, Syria as a punishment card for Iran, and wage from Saudi Arabia, Syria as a chance to consolidate America and the position of Trump in the Republican Electoral Program It summarizes.