Protecting the constitution in the case of bureaucratic justice based on personal dignity and prohibition of dignity

The constitution is the supreme norm of the legal system, and the coherence of this system requires compliance with the rules below the supreme rules. Defending the constitution is certainly one of the great achievements of public law in the last century. The value and validity of a constitution is maintained when all elements of the legal system are in harmony with it and the constitution is the dominant element in that system.The Administrative Justice Tribunal, which, under Article 173 of the Constitution, is the authority to deal with administrative disputes and to monitor the compliance of administrative regulations with Islamic law and the law; It opposes ordinary law and primarily the constitution and, by issuing judicial opinions as constitutional norms, has provided a valuable resource, namely judicial practice in the field.In the present article, while examining the aspects of judicial oversight over the administrative functions of the Court in the substantive jurisdiction of state law, the role of this judicial authority will be examined with a view to respect for persons and prohibition of dignity in the Constitution.