Strict Liability for the Sellers of Used Products; Given the developments in American law

Abstract Strict liability relies on the goals like efficient allocation of resources, distribution of risk, deterrence and consumer expectations. These goals in a generally speaking cannot be achieved because of the structural differences between new and used product markets. Naturally in used product markets, consumers expect lower price and quality. In addition to the existing conflict between the nature of this market and strict liability, it will not provide more secure goods. As a result, in the relationship between used product sellers and injured persons, the theory of negligence will provide greater social benefits unless the seller's conduct causes the expectation that the risk of used product is not higher than the new one.