Analysis and critique the distinction discovery/justification in methodology religious science

One of the views on religious science is to application the distinction between context of discovery and context of justification in this problem. Context of discovery is process which through the researcher arrives at the theory and context of justification is an attempt to justify that theory. The distinction was proposed by a solution to the use of theoretical background in scientific processes. Under the influence of the philosopher’s opinions in adherents of the distinction in the philosophy of science. The distinction was taken also in the methodology of religious studies. Based on the twofold demarcation the interposition of the religious elements canceled in context of justification and the religiousness of science is related to the context of discovery. This theory on one hand is useful in that it defends the certainty of science but the other hand that not playing non-epistemic elements in context of justification, has problems. There are three major criticisms on this view: 1. Critique of the existence of the distinction in science, especially religious studies 2. Association context of discovery and justification in the current production of religion science 3. Interposition of the non-epistemic elements in context of discovery/justification of religious science and not merely context of justification. The purpose of this study is explanation and evaluation the strengths powerful and weaknesses of application the distinction in religion science.