Ratio of Opinion And work In The Interpretation of Al-Basit Vahedi And Al-Tibyan By Sheikh Tusi With Emphasis on The Components of Opinion-Based Interpretation ( Tafsir Bi Ra’y)

In this article, the interpretive approach of Vahedi Neyshabouri (d. 468 AH) by Shafi'i commentator in Tafsir al-Basit and Sheikh Tusi (d. 460 AH) Shiite commentator in Tafsir al-Tibyan in opinion-based interpretation is examined. These two are commentators of the fifth century and almost belonged to the same years. In this way, Vahedi interprets the verses based on the word, aspects of its implications and the Quranic sciences. In his ijtihadi interpretation, he also combines the opinion-based interpretation and the work-based interpretation (Tafsit Athari). In the conflict, he gives priority to the work-based interpretation and justifies the findings of the opinion-based interpretation on the basis of the documents of effect-based interpretation. Sheikh Tusi uses interpretive narrations in four types: interpretive use, explaining the meanings of words, explaining the diacritic of the verses, and theological use. Tusi's ijtihadi, meanwhile, is a combination of interpretive sayings and narrations in the manner of criticizing some of them based on the narrations and confirming or reinforcing others. The similarities and differences between the two approaches are explained in the article.