The principle of immorality and the principle of legitimacy in Iranian jurisprudence and law

Abhaha and Halit are words that can be seen in jurisprudential works, jurisprudential rules and principles, but a lot of dust has covered the face of these two words in their meaning and concept, principle and statistics, and cases of flow. We must say that obscenity in the word means "to be revealed" and in the term it means that the field is open, in front of the obligee to take what he wants. That is, the obligee freely chooses to do or leave the present, and on the other hand, the word halal in the word means "permissible" and in the term means that any seizure of objects is lawful unless its sanctity and prohibition has been proven by the Shari'a. have taken. Our aim in this research is "to study the principle of impropriety and the principle of dissolution in Iranian jurisprudence and law", in which we try to clarify the meaning and concept of impropriety and dissolution accurately based on research method (descriptive-analytical) and library studies. Let us say that immorality and legitimacy are also synonymous, that is, everything that is permissible is lawful, and vice versa, and both constitute a rule or principle of jurisprudence called "the originality of immorality and immorality", the documents of which are the book, tradition, consensus and reason. Subjective jurisprudence and doubts apply in all chapters of jurisprudence, including worship and transactions, and are not specific to a specific chapter of jurisprudence.