Not Differentiating Between the Moral and Jurisprudential Statements of the Holy Quran (in Terms of Subject, Predicate, Purpose, Domain, and Legal Sanctions)

Islam has designed a system for the evolution of human society with its elements linked and related to each other, in a way that all its elements show a unique truth and a similar purpose. The system has been offered in the Holy Quran with three genetic, valued, and jurisprudential-legal subsystems which are related to each other. This is a comprehensive and effective program for managing human life. Some of the jurists and scholars of ethics believe that there is a fundamental difference between the elements of moral statements and jurisprudential statements of the Quran and they behave differently in practice. For the same reason, the present article aims at reaching the similarities between these two types of statements in the Holy Quran through contrasting the language of the moral and jurisprudential statements, and contrasting and examining the ratio of their analogous and important elements. It also aims to explain that they are linked to each other in terms of structure, purpose, and domain and that they manifest a unique truth. In addition it aims to prove that the above-mentioned subsystems have been offered and revealed in the form of intertwining subsystems and they have the same unique truth in terms of thobut and in the Guarded Tablet as they been revealed in terms of ethbat – after revelation- into a unique style with a unique structure and a common purpose. Therefore, they should not be differentiated in terms of deduction, systematization, and elements and the jurisprudential matters should not be raised practically without considering the moral values and requirements, because it causes great damages to the Islamic society.