Conflicts and similarities between Islamic human rights and international human rights with emphasis on women's rights in Iran

The aim of this study is to investigate the existing conflicts between Islamic human rights and universal human rights in the field of women's rights?

Using a qualitative method based on collecting information from library sources (documentary) and descriptive analytical method, the present article seeks to assess the hypothesis presented in this research.

In areas such as individual rights (right of citizenship, right to residence and housing), family rights (age of marriage, freedom to choose and polygamy, right of guardianship over the spouse, right Divorce and custody of the child), social rights (right to insurance and social security benefits and the right to health services), Women's cultural and spiritual rights (right to literacy based on co-education and restrictions on sending female students abroad), economic rights (right to work in certain occupations and also right to inheritance), political rights (right to be elected to some key positions in the country) Such as leadership and presidency) as well as in the legal and judicial spheres (women's right to legal personality, equality before the law and some women's civil and criminal rights such as blood money and martyrdom) conflicts between Islamic human rights and human rights The world is visible.

In addition to legal conflicts, differences in interpretations and the existence of some legal ambiguities between the two sources of Islamic and international human rights can be seen, which in practice leads to non-acceptance and accession to some human rights conventions in the field of women for Iran.