Examining the hegemonism of basic and middle level managers in the public universities of Tabriz and related factors of it

Many experts believe that managers are the first person, infrastructure or the cornerstone of an organization and in order to achieve the desired level of productivity, the most talented people for taking responsibility must be chosen. This study examines the hegemonism of basic and middle level managers in the public universities of Tabriz emphasizing the theories of Max Weber, Michel Foucault and also, from an organizational perspective, the concept of organizationalcommitment and job security are discussed. Statistical population is the employees and the basic and middle managers of public universities of Tabriz and data has been collected using questionnaires among the employees and administrators of public universities of Tabriz, Sahand and Azarbyjan teacher-training university.Stratified multi-stage sampling method is used and the sample size is 300 people. The results show that there is no significant relationship between age, management experience, academic rank and hegemonism of basic and middle managers of public universities of Tabriz. But there is a significant relationship between access to company information, tendency to discipline, organizational commitment, and job security and hegemonism of basic and middle managers of public universities of Tabriz. These relationships are moderate and reverse. Multiple regression results show that the variable of access to information by managers has very important role in the prediction of hegemonism of management. It can be said that three variables of access to information, tendency to discipline and commitment to the organization, can predict 33 percent of the variance of hegemonism of managers.