A Critical Study of the Moral Theory of Just War with Emphasis on Media Psychology from the Perspective of Nahj al-Balaghah

Lack of morale has always increased the damage caused by bloody and destructive wars, which has intensified with the development of weapons and weapons, so theories of morality in war have been proposed. One of these theories is the "just war" theory, which has been proposed to reduce the human and material damage of wars. This theory, which has a religious origin, has been widely welcomed first by Christian clergy and later by politicians. And raised after the war,. Just war does not include psychological warfare and hostile propaganda, and some claimants of the theory of propaganda (poisonous propaganda) have even allowed war.Due to the lack of religious critique of the principle of this theory and the permission of psychological and propaganda warfare in it, this article has critically and descriptively criticized the principle of theory and psychological warfare in terms of Nahj al-Balaghah and includes the following findings 1. Conceptual deviation of justice 2 Delegated and exclusive justice .3. Falsehood is a critique of the components of a theory. 4. Based on the characteristics of jihadi justice, explicit revelation, observance of justice, guidance and preaching, avoidance of deceit and deception in war have been criticized from the point of view of Nahj al-Balaghah, warlordism and hostile propaganda in the theory of just war.