Jurisprudential and legal principles of adherence to international negotiations and agreements

In the international system, adherence to contracts is an important and inviolable principle, because non-adherence to treaties leads to the violation of principles and violations of international rules. On the other hand, due to the existence of rules and laws of countries Domestic people are required to comply with them in international treaties and agreements. It creates a loophole and non-compliance. International is subject to sacred laws and sharia, the analysis and study of which seems necessary from a jurisprudential and legal point of view. Therefore, the main question of the present study is in what cases can international negotiations and agreements not be adhered to? This article seeks to answer this question with an analytical approach and using the library method. It seems to be social and international, on the other hand, due to the existence of inviolable rules and principles such as denying the domination and public interest of Muslims and the Islamic government, and by betrayal and bad faith of the other side, allows breaking the treaty. The country, international treaties and treaties that are concluded with other countries are subject to law and expediency and can not be acted upon. Our country is created to prevent any domination and negligence by violating the covenant.