Investigating the effective educational factors on the growth of creativity among high school students in Takab city

Creativity as a valuable educational goal or goal is never achieved in a vacuum, but its achievement and manifestation in various fields requires the preparation of a set of basic contexts and conditions, and considering the problems and bottlenecks in our educational system in There is a background for the growth and emergence of creativity in educational centers. This study seeks to analyze the role and position of effective factors in the growth of creativity of high school students. This research is a descriptive survey in terms of practical purpose and method and nature of data collection. Data collection included Torrance Spatial Visual Processing Questionnaire (1979), Pham and Taylor Students' Academic Performance Questionnaire; 1999, Cornwald Active Memory Questionnaire (1995), Metacognitive Questionnaire by Wells in 1997, Phillips Social Support Questionnaire 1986, in which convergent validity and reliability were calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The statistical population of this study included all teachers, principals and members of secondary education. The sample size was based on Cochran's formula 136 and the stratified cluster random sampling method was proportional to the sample size. The method was data analysis and structural equation modeling. . In order to collect information, library and field methods such as questionnaires were used. In order to investigate the effect of academic performance and working memory mediated by metacognition, cognition and emotional dimension on the growth of creativity of high school students was used. The results showed that academic performance and working memory mediated by metacognition, cognition and emotional dimension have a positive and significant effect on the growth of creativity of high school students. The results also showed that the analysis of academic performance was directly 0.09 and mediated by metacognition, cognition and emotional dimension respectively 0.594, 0.194 and 0.260, working memory directly by 0.081 and mediated by Metacognition, cognition and emotional dimension explain 0.606, 0.254 and 0.209, respectively.