Legitimacy of the Establishment of A Court by the Forces of the Anti-ISIL Coalition to Prosecute the Arrested Members of "ISIL" in Syria Wit a Respect at Alternative Mechanisms in International Law

Today, years after the formation of ISIS and the spread of theier Anti-human approach and brutal killing a lot of defenseless people, disregarding humanitarian law and spreading their terrorist operations to the heart of Europe, The international community is increasingly looking for a way to prevent and counter the group's actions and prosecute its leaders and members. One of the solutions pursued by the US-led anti-ISIL coalition is to establish an "international" tribunal to try ISIL detainees in Syria. An approach developed and expanded after World War II to prosecute individuals who violated international and humanitarian rules and regulations in an armed conflict. In the present article, which has been completed in an analytical-descriptive manner, an attempt has been made to assess the legitimacy and the degree of compliance of the establishment of such a reference with the rules and regulations of international law. Based on the findings of this study, it seems that the establishment of such a court is against the rules of international law and the UN Charter, and in addition to violating the sovereignty of Syria, it is also against the provisions of the statute of the International Criminal Court.