Identify and prioritize Leadership Substitutes in the Program and Budget Organization.by looking at organizational missions based on the Hill & Hope governance model

The present study was conducted with the aim of examining and prioritizing leadership Substitutes in the program and budget organization with a view to organizational mission. Leadership Substitutes have questioned the need for leadership in some situations. In such a way that some factors such as job, personal, organizational and value characteristics can be considered as a substitute for leadership. The method of this research is quantitative in terms of the nature of the data; In terms of purpose, it is practical. The statistical population included 7 organizational experts who were selected by judgmental sampling method and 33 senior staff managers of the Program and Budget Organization who were selected by census sampling method. Three researcher-made questionnaires were used to collect data. The data analysis method is SPSS software and one-sentence t-test as well as Lengo software and Mikhailov hierarchical method. This study showed that the Planning and Budget Organization, given the high levels of administrative independence and below average and almost low operational independence in carrying out its missions, can use which leadership Substitutes and with what priority. Also, the priority of the variables that make up the leadership Substitutes in the program and budget organization were determined as individual, organizational, job and value characteristics, respectively