Justification of belief in the existence of God under the influence of emotions from the perspective of Ayatollah Javadi Amoli and Sartre

Many contemporary philosophers consider emotions to be cognitive matters, so contrary to the common notion that emotions are uncontrollable attacks and are related to the animal aspect of man, cognitive emotions are controllable and reasonable and are closely related to human beliefs. For this reason, in the New Testament, the role of emotions in the realization of religious beliefs has been considered and re-read. Master Javadi Amoli believes that the desire for infinite perfection, which is an innate thing, leads to the belief in God. Such a belief also requires the existence of God in the external world. Sartre, on the other hand, as a philosopher of existence, by explaining the romantic relationship between human beings, believes that love leads to the deprivation of the freedom of the lover and the beloved, and therefore is not justifiable; Also, because God is beyond love in a human relationship, it leads to the deprivation of human freedom in the first way, and thus belief in God is by no means justified. This article examines the analysis of both thinkers' feelings of love in a descriptive-analytical manner, examines the justification of human love for God as the basis of religious belief, and tries to show whether love as an emotional state can be a suitable criterion for proving God's external existence?