Civil Spending Practices of Bribed Assets in the Iranian Banking System and International Documents

Most of the assets and property resulting from usury and bribery crimes are taken out of the territorial territories of countries and access to them is generally associated with many problems. However, if they access this property by returning it to the country where the crime took place, the issue of their Kurdish expenses arises. Countries usually punish perpetrators of public bribery with imprisonment and fines. While there are no transnational anti-bribery laws in many countries - the present study concludes that there are weaknesses in anti-bribery mechanisms in terms of Iranian banking law compared to international instruments. One of the weaknesses is the more focused attention to public bribery than private bribery. Because criminal law in modern law tends to provide more protection to public property than to private property, Damage to property implies a loss of citizens' trust and confidence in the ruling forces and as a result a threat to public welfare. He pointed out the elimination of conflicts between existing laws, effective support for informants of corruption, reform of the banking system, especially transparency and public access to the allocation of banking resources and expenses.