Considering the narrative proofs of Wahhabism in authenticity of "single narrations" in issues regarding the faith

One of the creeds of Wahhabism is that the "single narration" in the faith issues is authentic just like the jurisprudential realm. We must have faith in that and if someone denies that it will be considered as opposing to the tradition of the Holy prophet Muhammad (PBH). Hence, the Wahhabis accused Muslims to blasphemy and heresy for denying the authority of "single narration" in the faith issues. In this research, by descriptive- analytic method, the Wahhabi sources are studied and the findings are as the following: the Najd scholars for proving their claim have resorted to some narrations and Hadiths. Some of the famous ones are the followings: the narration that tells that the Holy Prophet (PBH) sends the Maaz to Yemen, the narration about changing the direction of Ghibla. The main problem with these narrations is that the single narration cannot prove its authenticity, because this is a vicious circle. Furthermore, there are some other problems with these narrations as well. The Maaz narration is a single narration that has no other indicator to help it. Also, the narration of changing the direction of Ghibla is in contradiction with historical narrations and it refers to a jurisprudential topic, and there is no doubt in authenticity of single narration in jurisprudential topics.