Jurisprudential and legal foundations of important quasi-judicial authorities in municipalities

The purpose of the current research is to investigate important quasi-judicial authorities in municipalities. The research method is descriptive and analytical, and the normal laws and approvals of the Council of Ministers and the law describing the duties of municipalities and rural districts have been used. In this research, only the Article 1000 Commission, the Article 77 Commission, the Article 99 Commission, the Tasbra Commission under Article 55 Clause 20, and the Garden Identification Commission were investigated. The results showed that in the Commission, Article 100 of the proceedings indicates compliance with the legal formalities of the procedure, but the lack of transparency in its notes causes many legal problems. The problem with the Article 77 commission is that it is one-stage, and unlike the Article 100 commission, it does not have an appeal commission. The Commission, Clause 20, Article 55 of the Municipal Law is one of the examples in which the laws related to urban planning in the field of urban services are planned and controlled in a completely specialized manner. The above-mentioned commission is the authority to deal with citizens' objections to the municipality's decision regarding the closure, destruction and relocation of disruptive industries and businesses outside the city. Its common feature with the Article 77 commission is that the commission does not have an appeal and is one-stage, and the Article 99 commission is in the suburban area and outside the city, and the place of formation is in the governorates, but the place of formation of the Article 77 commission is in the municipalities.