The role of compulsory contracts in the control of political and economic crises by governments

There is basically no separate contract called a " compulsory contract". Conversely, all contracts are ultimately subject to a certain level of coercion. The combination of "contract" and "coercion" is more than a legal term, it is an obvious semantic conflict. However, it has a legal capacity so without using this name, it can be considered an important place in the law. Usually, such descriptive combinations tell long stories of bitter experiences in history; Phrases that purify abuse and coercion in the guise of soft words like "contract." Are coercions that have become a contract legal enough to facilitate coercion and enjoy civil protection? Given the lack of sufficient resources in the field of compulsory contracts in Iranian law, this discussion inevitably has new and thought-provoking phrases that can open a new chapter in Iranian legal discussions. This article intends to answer this question by addressing the issue of "coercion" in legal relations when included in a contract. Assuming that "contract" is a sign of civilization and the rule of law based on the free "acceptance" or "rejection" of an offer, what effect does the description "coercion" have on the meaning of the contract?