Criticism of the Inherent Historicity of Understanding Centered on the Qur'an

Philosophical hermeneutics claims that understanding is born of historical conditions in various ways and is necessarily affected by it, and with its change, the conditions of understanding change and are formed according to new conditions. According to Gadamer, understanding is subject to various historical conditions, such as the interpreter's semantic horizon, his presuppositions, and the applicability of understanding. According to Heidegger, understanding is subject to fore-Having, fore-Sight, foreconception, which are all aspects of human existence. Dignity determines how a person understands; These are the main form of subsequent understandings and they are also fluid and influenced by historical conditions. Understanding is always the result of the fusion of historical horizons and as a result, the production of new meaning, not the reproduction of the author's meaning; Therefore, it is not possible to reach the author's intention. The above-mentioned dignity and the factors involved in self-understanding cannot be considered and studied independently, because whatever is chosen to be understood, it is understood through the channel of these virtues.

This article tries to deal with this issue with the method of inferring the verses of the Quran and inferring from them and with a critical view.

The findings of the article are summarized below -What is obtained from several verses of the Qur'an is not a criticism of historical foundations, because the Qur'an has no entrance to these new specialized topics; Rather, the denial of the result of these foundations means the denial of the inherent historicity of understanding, and when the result is denied, the original foundations are also questioned. Different categories of verses with implied implication can the negation of the inherent nature of all the dignity of understanding, which in Gadamer's view has caused the inherent historicity of understanding. -The verses informing about the occurrence of education, which comes along with the mention of education, imply that the understanding has been realized in accordance with reality and is permanent, and it implies with implied implication that the understanding of fact has occurred without the interference of the historical assumptions of man and his historical horizon; While in philosophical hermeneutics, all understandings are necessarily historical. -All different categories of verses that indicate the possibility of knowledge are incompatible with the inherent historicity of understanding. -There are many verses in the Qur'an that indicate, contrary to the claim of philosophical hermeneutics, that man has the ability to look independently at himself, his mind, his thoughts and ideas.

Consideration in the verses indicates that the meaning of different categories of verses independently or by adding some rational considerations does not agree with the view of the inherent historicity of understanding; Rather, the opposite can be inference from the verses.